ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Selection for group-level efficiency leads to self-regulation of population size
Full text PdfPdf (3.33 MB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Atlanta, GA, USA
SESSION: Artificial life, evolutionary robotics, adaptive behavior, evolvable hardware papers table of contents
Pages 185-192  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-130-9
Authors
Benjamin E. Beckmann  Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Philip K. McKinley  Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Charles Ofria  Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 62,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1389095.1389126
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In general, a population will grow until a limiting factor, such as resource availability, is reached. However, increased task efficiency can also regulate the size of a population during task development. Through the use of digital evolution, we demonstrate that the evolution of a group-level task, requiring a small number of individuals, can cause a population to self-regulate its size, even in the presence of abundant energy. We also show that as little as a 1% transfer of energy from a parent group to its offspring produces significantly better results than no energy transfer. A potential application of this result is the configuration and management of real-world distributed agent-based systems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
C. Adami, C. A. Ofria, and T. C. Collier. Evolution of biological complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(9):4463--4468, April 2000.
 
3
J. Arabas, Z. Michalewicz, and J. J. Mulawka. Gavaps - a genetic algorithm with varying population size. In International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 73--78, 1994.
 
4
 
5
A. Bieszczad, T. White, and B. Pagurek. Mobile agents for network management. IEEE Communications Surveys, 1998.
 
6
M. Dorigo. Swarmanoid project. http://www.swarmanoid.org, January 2008.
 
7
H. Eskandari, C. D. Geiger, and G. B. Lamont. FastPGA: A dynamic population sizing approach forsolving expensive multiob jective optimization problems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, volume 4403 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 141--155. Springer, 2006.
 
8
C. Fernandes and A. C. Rosa. Self-regulated population size in evolutionary algorithms. In PPSN, volume 4193 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 920--929. Springer, 2006.
 
9
D. Floreano, S. Mitri, S. Magnenat, and L. Keller. Evolutionary conditions for the emergence of communication in robots. Current Biology, 17:514--519, March 2007.
 
10
D. Floreano and F. Mondada. Evolution of Homing Navigation in a Real Mobile Robot. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part B : Cybernetics, 26(3):396--407, 1996.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
R. E. Lenki, C. A. Ofria, T. C. Collier, and C. Adami. Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms. Nature, 400:661--664, 1999.
 
16
R. E. Lenski, C. Ofria, R. T. Pennock, and C. Adami. The evolutionary origin of complex features. Nature, 423:139--144, 2003.
17
 
18
 
19
G. McHale and P. Husbands. Incorporating energy expenditure into evolutionary robotics fitness measures. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, pages 206 -- 212, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006. MIT Press.
 
20
 
21
22
 
23
24
 
25
A. C. Society. Global cancer facts & figures, 2007.
 
26
27
 
28
 
29
C. O. Wilke, J. Wang, C. A. Ofria, C. Adami, and R. E. Lenki. Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rate leads to survival of the flattest. Nature, 412:331--333, 2001.
 
30
D. S. Wilson. Introduction: Multilevel selection theory comes of age. The American Naturalist, 150(S1-S4), July 1997.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Benjamin E. Beckmann: colleagues
Philip K. McKinley: colleagues
Charles Ofria: colleagues