| Social interaction in particle swarm optimization, the ranked FIPS, and adaptive multi-swarms |
| Full text |
Pdf
(303 KB)
|
Source
|
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
table of contents
Atlanta, GA, USA
SESSION: Ant colony optimization, swarm intelligence, and artificial immune systems papers
table of contents
Pages 49-56
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-130-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
Johannes Jordan
|
University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
|
|
Sabine Helwig
|
University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
|
|
Rolf Wanka
|
University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7, Downloads (12 Months): 74, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The interaction among particles is a vital aspect of Particle Swarm Optimization. As such, it has a strong influence on the swarm's success. In this study various approaches regarding the particles' communication behavior and their relationship are examined, as well as possibilities to combine the approaches. A new variant of the popular FIPS algorithm, the so-called Ranked FIPS, is introduced, which resolves specific shortcomings of the traditional FIPS. As all tested PSO variants feature distinct strengths and weaknesses, a new adaptive strategy is proposed which operates on dissimiliarly configured subswarms. The exchange between these subswarms is solely based on particle migration. The combination of the Ranked FIPS and other strategies within the so called Particle Swarm Optimizer with Migration achieves a very good, yet remarkably reliable performance over a wide range of recognized benchmark problems.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
D. Bratton and J. Kennedy. Defining a standard for Particle Swarm Optimization. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2007.
|
| |
3
|
J. Kennedy. Stereotyping: Improving particle swarm performance with cluster analysis. In Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 150--151. IEEE Service Center, 2000.
|
| |
4
|
R. Mendes, J. Kennedy, and J. Neves. The fully informed particle swarm: Simpler, maybe better. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 8(3):204--210, 2004.
|
| |
5
|
J. Kennedy and R. Mendes. Neighborhood topologies in fully informed and best-of-neighborhood particle swarms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 36(4):515--519, July 2006.
|
| |
6
|
P. N. Suganthan. Particle swarm optimiser with neighbourhood operator. In Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, volume 3, pages 1958--1962. IEEE Press, 6-9 July 1999.
|
| |
7
|
M. Richards and D. Ventura. Dynamic sociometry in particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Natural Computing, pages 1557--1560, North Carolina, September 2003.
|
| |
8
|
R. Mendes, J. Kennedy, and J. Neves. Watch thy neighbor or how the swarm can learn from its environment. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, pages 88--94. IEEE, 2003.
|
| |
9
|
P. N. Suganthan, N. Hansen, J. J. Liang, K. Deb, Y. P. Chen, A. Auger, and S. Tiwari. Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2005 Special Session on Real--Parameter Optimization. Technical report, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2005.
|
| |
10
|
|
|