ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Accelerating convergence using rough sets theory for multi-objective optimization problems
Full text PdfPdf (643 KB)
Source
Genetic And Evolutionary Computation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2008 GECCO conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation table of contents
Atlanta, GA, USA
WORKSHOP SESSION: Graduate student workshops table of contents
Pages 1799-1802  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-131-6
Authors
Luis V. Santana-Quintero  CINVESTAV-IPN, MEXICO CITY, Mexico
Carlos A. Coello Coello  CINVESTAV-IPN, MEXICO CITY, Mexico
Sponsors
SIGEVO: ACM Special Interest Group on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 80,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1388969.1388974
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We propose the use of rough sets theory to improve the first approximation provided by a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and retain the nondominated solutions using a new adaptive grid based on the ε-dominance concept that tries to overcome the main limitation of ε-dominance: the loss of several nondominated solutions from the hypergrid adopted in the archive because of the way in which solutions are selected within each box. We decided to use a multi-objective version of differential evolution to build a first approximation of the Pareto front and in a second stage, we use the rough sets theory in order to improve the spread of the solutions found so far. To assess our proposed hybrid approach, we adopt a set of standard test functions and metrics taken from the specialized literature. Our results are compared with respect to the NSGA-II, which is an approach representative of the state-of-the-art in the area.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
H. A. Abbass. The Self-Adaptive Pareto Differential Evolution Algorithm. In Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC'2002), volume 1, pages 831--836, Piscataway, New Jersey, May 2002. IEEE Service Center.
 
2
 
3
 
4
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2):182--197, April 2002.
 
5
K. Deb, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, and E. Zitzler. Scalable Test Problems for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. In A. Abraham, L. Jain, and R. Goldberg, editors, Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. Theoretical Advances and Applications, pages 105--145. Springer, USA, 2005.
 
6
 
7
 
8
S. Kukkonen and J. Lampinen. An Extension of Generalized Differential Evolution for Multi-objective Optimization with Constraints. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN VIII, pages 752--761, Birmingham, UK, September 2004. Springer-Verlag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3242.
 
9
Z. Pawlak. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 11(1):341--356, Summer 1982.
 
10
T. Robič and B. Filipič. DEMO: Differential Evolution for Multiobjective Optimization. In C. A. C. Coello, A. Hernández, and E. Zitzler, editors, Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. Third International Conference, EMO 2005, pages 520--533, Guanajuato, México, March 2005. Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3410.
 
11
L. V. Santana-Quintero and C. A. C. Coello. An Algorithm Based on Differential Evolution for Multi-objective Problems. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 1(2):151--169, 2005.
 
12
R. Storn and K. Price. Differential evolution - a simple and efficient adaptative scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Technical Report TR-95- 12, International Computer Science, Berkeley, California, March 1995.
 
13
 
14
 
15
E. Zitzler and L. Thiele. Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study and the Strength Pareto Approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(4):257--271, November 1999.
 
16
E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, C. M. Fonseca, and V. G.da Fonseca. Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 7(2):117--132, Summer 2003.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Luis V. Santana-Quintero: colleagues
Carlos A. Coello Coello: colleagues