|
ABSTRACT
We propose the use of rough sets theory to improve the first approximation provided by a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and retain the nondominated solutions using a new adaptive grid based on the ε-dominance concept that tries to overcome the main limitation of ε-dominance: the loss of several nondominated solutions from the hypergrid adopted in the archive because of the way in which solutions are selected within each box. We decided to use a multi-objective version of differential evolution to build a first approximation of the Pareto front and in a second stage, we use the rough sets theory in order to improve the spread of the solutions found so far. To assess our proposed hybrid approach, we adopt a set of standard test functions and metrics taken from the specialized literature. Our results are compared with respect to the NSGA-II, which is an approach representative of the state-of-the-art in the area.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
H. A. Abbass. The Self-Adaptive Pareto Differential Evolution Algorithm. In Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC'2002), volume 1, pages 831--836, Piscataway, New Jersey, May 2002. IEEE Service Center.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2):182--197, April 2002.
|
| |
5
|
K. Deb, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, and E. Zitzler. Scalable Test Problems for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. In A. Abraham, L. Jain, and R. Goldberg, editors, Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. Theoretical Advances and Applications, pages 105--145. Springer, USA, 2005.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
S. Kukkonen and J. Lampinen. An Extension of Generalized Differential Evolution for Multi-objective Optimization with Constraints. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN VIII, pages 752--761, Birmingham, UK, September 2004. Springer-Verlag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3242.
|
| |
9
|
Z. Pawlak. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 11(1):341--356, Summer 1982.
|
| |
10
|
T. Robič and B. Filipič. DEMO: Differential Evolution for Multiobjective Optimization. In C. A. C. Coello, A. Hernández, and E. Zitzler, editors, Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. Third International Conference, EMO 2005, pages 520--533, Guanajuato, México, March 2005. Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 3410.
|
| |
11
|
L. V. Santana-Quintero and C. A. C. Coello. An Algorithm Based on Differential Evolution for Multi-objective Problems. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 1(2):151--169, 2005.
|
| |
12
|
R. Storn and K. Price. Differential evolution - a simple and efficient adaptative scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Technical Report TR-95- 12, International Computer Science, Berkeley, California, March 1995.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
E. Zitzler and L. Thiele. Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study and the Strength Pareto Approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(4):257--271, November 1999.
|
| |
16
|
E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, C. M. Fonseca, and V. G.da Fonseca. Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 7(2):117--132, Summer 2003.
|
|