ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A platform to support decentralized and dynamically distributed P2P composite OWL-S service execution
Full text PdfPdf (640 KB)
Source Middleware Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Middleware for service oriented computing: held at the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference table of contents
Newport Beach, California
Pages 24-29  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-928-9
Authors
Thorsten Möller  University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Heiko Schuldt  University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 71,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1388336.1388340
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In a large variety of applications, it is increasingly important to provide application functionality in a modular way by means of (Web) services. At the same time, pre-defined applications are no longer suitable to cope with the high functional dynamics that can be found in novel e-business, e-health, and e-science applications. In contrast, dynamic application creation, i.e., applications that are assembled ad hoc by service composition and usually instantiated very few times, are more and more becoming prevalent. Form a systems point of view, large scale application environments like the Internet create scalability requirements towards distributed execution of composite (Web) services which go beyond the traditional non-distributed approach to manage composite services.

The contribution of this paper is threefold. First, we present a novel approach that combines those aspects by using different technologies in a distributed environment to dynamically distribute composite service execution in situations where it is beneficial or required. Second, the approach considers semantic annotation of services to facilitate new possibilities for data and service co-ordination. Third, the approach also incorporates the interfaces needed to integrate service execution with semantic service composition planners to allow for dynamic forward failure recovery by contingency service re-planning. These concepts are currently developed on the basis of the peer-to-peer platform OSIRIS NEXT which supports dynamically distributed and decentralized execution of composite semantic services that are described based on OWL-S.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
T. Bauer and M. Reichert. Dynamic Change of Server Assignments in Distributed Workflow Management Systems. In Proc. of the 6th Int'l Conf. on Enterprise Information Systems, pages 91--98, Porto, Portugal, 2004.
 
3
 
4
G. Brettlecker, H. Schuldt, and H.-J. Schek. Efficient and Coordinated Checkpointing for Reliable Distributed Data Stream Management. In Proc. of the 10th Conf. on Advances in Databases and Information Systems, pages 296--312, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2006.
 
5
E. Christensen, F. Curbera, G. Meredith, and S. Weerawarana. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl, 2001.
 
6
D. Martin et al. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S, 2004.
 
7
Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents. FIPA ACL message structure. SC00061, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
 
8
 
9
H. Lausen, A. Polleres, and D. Roman. Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO). http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSMO, 2005.
 
10
D. Martin, M. Paolucci, and M. Wagner. Towards Semantic Annotations of Web Services: OWL-S from the SAWSDL Perspective, 2007. OWL-S: Experiences and Directions - workshop at 4th European Semantic Web Conf.
11
 
12
M. Paolucci, A. Ankolekar, N. Srinivasan, and K. Sycara. The DAML-S virtual machine. In Int'l Semantic Web Conf., volume 2879, pages 290--305. Springer, 2003.
 
13
 
14
S. Rinderle, S. Bassil, and M. Reichert. A Framework for Semantic Recovery Strategies in Case of Process Activity Failures. In Proc. 8th Int'l Conf. on Enterprise Information Systems, Paphos, Cyprus, 2006.
 
15
 
16
C. Schuler, C. Türker, H.-J. Schek, R. Weber, and H. Schuldt. Scalable peer-to-peer process management. Int'l Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 2006.
 
17
 
18
M. Schumacher, H. Helin, and H. Schuldt, editors. CASCOM: Intelligent Service Coordination in the Semantic Web. Whitestein, to appear.
 
19
E. Sirin. OWL-S API project website. http://www.mindswap.org/2004/owl-s/api.
 
20
T. Schabetsberger et al. From a paper-based transmission of discharge summaries to electronic communication in health care regions. Int'l Journal of Medical Informatics, 3--4(75):209--215, 2006.
 
21
IBM WebSphere Business Process Choreopgrapher. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/zones/was/wpc.html, 2007.
 
22

Collaborative Colleagues:
Thorsten Möller: colleagues
Heiko Schuldt: colleagues