ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Activity recognition via user-trace segmentation
Full text PdfPdf (991 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 4  (August 2008) table of contents
Article No. 19  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1550-4859
Authors
Jie Yin  CSIRO ICT Centre, NSW, Australia
Qiang Yang  Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Dou Shen  Microsoft Adcenter Labs, Redmond, WA
Ze-Nian Li  Simon Fraser University, Burnaby B.C., Canada
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 272,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1387663.1387665
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A major issue of activity recognition in sensor networks is automatically recognizing a user's high-level goals accurately from low-level sensor data. Traditionally, solutions to this problem involve the use of a location-based sensor model that predicts the physical locations of a user from the sensor data. This sensor model is often trained offline, incurring a large amount of calibration effort. In this article, we address the problem using a goal-based segmentation approach, in which we automatically segment the low-level user traces that are obtained cheaply by collecting the signal sequences as a user moves in wireless environments. From the traces we discover primitive signal segments that can be used for building a probabilistic activity model to recognize goals directly. A major advantage of our algorithm is that it can reduce a significant amount of human effort in calibrating the sensor data while still achieving comparable recognition accuracy. We present our theoretical framework for activity recognition, and demonstrate the effectiveness of our new approach using the data collected in an indoor wireless environment.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Anderson, B. D. O. and Moore, J. B. 1979. Optimal Filtering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
 
3
Bahl, P., Balachandran, A., and Padmanabhan, V. 2000. Enhancements to the RADAR user location and tracking system. Tech. rep. MSR-TR-2000-12, Microsoft Research.
 
4
Bahl, P. and Padmanabhan, V. N. 2000. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM). Tel-Aviv, Israel, 775--784.
 
5
Blaylock, N. and Allen, J. 2003. Corpus-based statistical goal recognition. In Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Acapulco, Mexico, 1303--1308.
 
6
 
7
Bui, H., Phung, D., and Venkatesh, S. 2004. Hierarchical hidden Markov models with general state hierarchy. In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). San Jose, CA, 324--329.
 
8
Bui, H., Venkatesh, S., and West, G. 2002. Policy recognition in the abstract hidden Markov model. J. Art. Intel. Res. 17, 451--499.
 
9
 
10
11
 
12
Czielniak, G., Bennewitz, M., and Burgard, W. 2003. Where is …? learning and utilizing motion patterns of persons with mobile robots. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Acapulco, Mexico, 909--914.
 
13
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via EM algorithm. J. Royal Statis. Soc. Series B 39, 1--38.
 
14
Enge, P. and Misra, P. 1999. Special issue on GPS: The global positioning system. Proc. IEEE, 3--172.
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Ghahramani, Z. and Hinton, G. E. 1998. Switching state-space models. Tech. Rep., 6 King's College Road, Toronto M5S 3H5, Canada.
 
19
Goldman, R., Geib, C., and Miller, C. 1999. A new model of plan recognition. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI). Stockholm, Sweden, 245--254.
20
 
21
Han, K. and Veloso, M. 2000. Automated robot behavior recognition applied to robotic soccer. In Robotics Research: the 9th International Symposium. Springer-Verlag, London, 199--204.
 
22
 
23
Kautz, H. and Allen, J. F. 1986. Generalized plan recognition. In Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Philadelphia, PA, 32--37.
 
24
25
 
26
Lari, K. and Young, S. J. 1990. The estimation of stochastic context-free grammars using the inside-outside algorithm. Comput. Speech Lang. 4, 35--56.
 
27
Lesh, N. and Etzioni, O. 1995. A sound and fast goal recognizer. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Montreal, Canada, 1704--1710.
28
 
29
Liao, L., Fox, D., and Kautz, H. 2004. Learning and inferring transportation routines. In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference in Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). San Jose, CA, 348--353.
 
30
31
 
32
Minka, T. 1998. Expectation-maximization as lower bound maximization. Tutorial. http://research.microsoft.com/~minka/papers/em.html.
 
33
 
34
Murphy, K. 1998. Learning switching Kalman filter models. Tech. rep. TR 98--10, Compaq Cambridge Research Lab.
 
35
 
36
Nguyen, N., Bui, H., Venkatesh, S., and West, G. 2003. Recognising and monitoring high-level behaviours in complex spatial environments. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Madison, WI, 620--625.
 
37
 
38
Oh, S. M., Regh, J. M., Balch, T., and Dellaert, F. 2005. Data-driven MCMC for learning and inference in switching linear dynamic systems. In Proceedings of the 20th National Conference in Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Pittsburgh, PA, 944--949.
 
39
Patterson, D., Liao, L., Fox, L., and Kautz, H. 2003. Inferring high-level behavior from low-level sensors. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp). Seattle, WA, 73--89.
 
40
Pavlović, V. and Rehg, J. M. 2000. Impact of dynamic model learning on classification of human motion. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Hilton Head Island, SC, 788--795.
 
41
Pavlović, V., Rehg, J. M., Cham, T.-J., and Murphy, K. 1999. A dynamic Bayesian network approach to figure tracking using learned dynamic models. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Kerkyra, Corfu, Greece, 94--101.
 
42
Pavlović, V., Rehg, J. M., and MacCormick, J. 2000. Learning switching linear models of human motion. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS). Vol. 13. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 981--987.
 
43
44
 
45
 
46
Roos, T., Myllymaki, P., Tirri, H., Misikangas, P., and Sievanen, J. 2002. A probabilistic approach to WLAN user location estimation. Int. J. Wireless Inform. Netw. 9, 3 (July), 155--164.
 
47
Smailagic, A. and Kogan, D. 2002. Location sensing and privacy in a context aware computing environment. IEEE Wirel. Comm. 9, 5, 10--17.
 
48
Tapia, E. M., Intille, S., and Larson, K. 2004. Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive). Vienna, Austria, 158--175.
 
49
Tekinay, S. 1998. Special issue on wireless geolocation systems and services. IEEE Comm. Mag. 87, 1 (April).
50
 
51
Wren, C. R. and Tapia, E. M. 2006. Toward scalable activity recognition for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International workshop in Location and Context-Awareness (LoCA). Vol. 3987. Dublin, Ireland, 168--185.
 
52
Yin, J., Chai, X., and Yang, Q. 2004. High-level goal recognition in a wireless LAN. In Proceedings of the 19th National Conference in Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). San Jose, CA, 578--584.
 
53
Yin, J., Shen, D., Yang, Q., and Li, Z.-N. 2005a. Activity recognition through goal-based segmentation. In Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Pittsburgh, PA, 28--33.
 
54
 
55
Youssef, M. and Agrawala, A. 2004. Handling samples correlation in the horus system. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Conference on Computer Communications and Networking (INFOCOM). Hong Kong, China, 1023--1031.
 
56
 
57
 
58
Zhu, X. 2005. Semi-supervised learning literature survey. Tech. rep. 1530, Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jie Yin: colleagues
Qiang Yang: colleagues
Dou Shen: colleagues
Ze-Nian Li: colleagues