ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Defending wireless sensor networks from radio interference through channel adaptation
Full text PdfPdf (1.02 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 4  (August 2008) table of contents
Article No. 18  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1550-4859
Authors
Wenyuan Xu  University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
Wade Trappe  WINLAB, Rutgers University, North Brunswick, NJ
Yanyong Zhang  WINLAB, Rutgers University, North Brunswick, NJ
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 330,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1387663.1387664
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Radio interference, whether intentional or otherwise, represents a serious threat to assuring the availability of sensor network services. As such, techniques that enhance the reliability of sensor communications in the presence of radio interference are critical. In this article, we propose to cope with this threat through a technique called channel surfing, whereby the sensor nodes in the network adapt their channel assignments to restore network connectivity in the presence of interference. We explore two different approaches to channel surfing: coordinated channel switching, in which the entire sensor network adjusts its channel; and spectral multiplexing, in which nodes in a jammed region switch channels and nodes on the boundary of a jammed region act as radio relays between different spectral zones. For coordinated channel switching, we examine an autonomous strategy where each node detects the loss of its neighbors in order to initiate channel switching. To cope with latency issues in the autonomous strategy, we propose a broadcast-assisted channel switching strategy to more rapidly coordinate channel switching. For spectral multiplexing, we have devised both synchronous and asynchronous strategies to facilitate the scheduling of nodes in order to improve network fidelity when sensor nodes operate on multiple channels. In designing these algorithms, we have taken a system-oriented approach that has focused on exploring actual implementation issues under realistic network settings. We have implemented these proposed methods on a testbed of 30 Mica2 sensor nodes, and the experimental results show that channel surfing, in its various forms, is an effective technique for repairing network connectivity in the presence of radio interference, while not introducing significant performance-overhead.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
5
6
7
 
8
Kyasanur, P. and Vaidya, N. 2003. Detection and handling of MAC layer misbehavior in wireless networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. 173--182.
 
9
Law, Y., Hartel, P., den Hartog, J., and Havinga, P. 2005. Link-layer jamming attacks on S-MAC. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN'05). 217--225.
 
10
Ma, K., Zhang, Y., and Trappe, W. 2005. Mobile network management and robust spatial retreats via network dynamics. In Proceedings of the The 1st International Workshop on Resource Provisioning and Management in Sensor Networks (RPMSN05).
 
11
Madden, S., Franklin, M., Hellerstein, J., and Hong, W. 2002. TAG: a Tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Usenix Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation.
 
12
Navda, V., Bohra, A., Ganguly, S., and Rubenstein. 2007. Using channel hopping to Increase 802.11 resilience to jamming attacks. In IEEE Infocom Minisymposium. Anchorage, AK.
13
 
14
15
 
16
Proakis, J. G. 2000. Digital Communications, 4th Ed. McGraw-Hill.
 
17
Rajeswaran, A. and Negi, R. 2005. DoS analysis of reservation based MAC protocols. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications.
18
 
19
Rappaport, S. S. and Grieco, D. M. 1984. Spread-spectrum signal acquisition—Methods and technology. IEEE Comm. Mag. 22, 6--21.
20
 
21
22
 
23
TinyOS. Tinyos homepage. http://webs.cs.berkeley.edu/tos/.
24
25
 
26
 
27
28
29
 
30
Ye, W., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2002. An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM. Vol. 3. 1567--1576.
31

Collaborative Colleagues:
Wenyuan Xu: colleagues
Wade Trappe: colleagues
Yanyong Zhang: colleagues