ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Permutation betting markets: singleton betting with extra information
Full text PdfPdf (264 KB)
Source
Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Chicago, Il, USA
SESSION: Prediction markets table of contents
Pages 180-189  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-169-9
Authors
Mohammad Ghodsi  Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Hamid Mahini  Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Vahab S. Mirrokni  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Morteza ZadiMoghaddam  Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1386790.1386821
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study permutation betting markets, introduced by Chen, Fortnow, Nikolova, and Pennock [3]. For these markets, we consider subset bettings in which each trader can bet on a subset of candidates ending up in a subset of positions. We consider the revenue maximization problem for the auctioneer in two main frameworks: the risk-free revenue maximization (studied in [3]), and the probabilistic revenue maximization. We also explore the use of some certain knowledge or extra information about the possible outcomes of the market. We first show that finding the optimal revenue in the risk-free model for the subset betting problem is inapproximable. This resolves an open question posed by Chen et al. [3]. In order to identify solvable variants of the problem, we propose the singleton betting language which allows traders to bet an arbitrary value on one candidate for one position. For singleton bettings, we first provide a linear-time implementable necessary and sufficient condition for existence of a solution with positive revenue for any possible outcome. Furthermore, we develop an LP-based polynomial-time algorithm to find the optimum solution of this problem. In addition, we show how to extend this LP-based method to handle some extra information about the possible outcomes. Finally, we consider the revenue maximization problem in a probabilistic setting. For this variant, we observe that the problem of maximizing the expected revenue is polynomial-time solvable, but we show that maximizing the probability of achieving a pre-specified revenue is #P-Complete.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J.E. Berg, R. Forsythe, F.D. Nelson, and T.A. Rietz. Results from a dozen years of election futures markets research. In C.A. Plottand V. Smith, editors, Handbook of Experimental Economic Results, 2001.
 
2
3
 
4
D. Pennock. Personal Communications.
 
5
 
6
R. Forsythe, T.A. Rietz, and T.W. Ross. Wishes, expectations, and actions: A survey on price formation in election stock markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39:83--110, 1999.
7
 
8
U. Feige, K. Jain, M. Mahdian, and V.S. Mirrokni. Robust Combinatorial Optimization with Exponential Number of Scenarios. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, 2007.
 
9
10
 
11
 
12
I. Heller, C.B. Tompkins. An extension of a theorem of Dantzig's, in: H.W. Kuhn, A.W. Tucker (Eds.), Linear Inequalities and Related Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1956, pp.247--254.
 
13
14
 
15
Y. Nikulin. Robustness in combinatorial optimization and scheduling theory: An annotated bibliography. Technical Report SOR-91-13, Statistics and Operation Research, 2004.
 
16
 
17
D.M. Pennock, S. Lawrence, C.L. Giles, and F.A. Nielsen. The real power of artifircial markets. Science, 291:987--988, February 2002.
 
18
C. Papadimitriou
 
19
C. Plott and S. Sunder. Efficiency of experimental security markets with insider information: An application of rational expectations models. Journal of Political Economy, 90:663--98, 1982
 
20
C. Plott and S. Sunder. Rational expectations and the aggregation of diverse information in laboratory security markets. Econometrica, 56:1085--1118, 1988.
 
21
 
22
A. Schrijver. Total Dual Integrality of Matching Forest Constraints. Combinatorica, 20:575--588, 2000.
 
23
 
24
A. Schrijver, Combinatorial Optimization - Polyhedra and Efficiency, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mohammad Ghodsi: colleagues
Hamid Mahini: colleagues
Vahab S. Mirrokni: colleagues
Morteza ZadiMoghaddam: colleagues