ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The complexity of forecast testing: abstract
Full text PdfPdf (114 KB)
Source
Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Chicago, Il, USA
SESSION: Eliciting the truth and worrying about lying table of contents
Pages 139-139  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-169-9
Authors
Lance Fortnow  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Rakesh Vohra  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 26,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1386790.1386814
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Consider a weather forecaster predicting a probability of rain for the next day. We consider tests that given a finite sequence of forecast predictions and outcomes will either pass or fail the forecaster. Sandroni shows that any test which passes a forecaster who knows the distribution of nature can also be probabilistically passed by a forecaster with no knowledge of future events.

We look at the computational complexity of such forecasters and exhibit a linear-time test and distribution of nature such that any forecaster without knowledge of the future that can fool the test must be able to solve computationally difficult problems. Thus, unlike Sandroni, a computationally efficient forecaster cannot always fool this test independent of nature.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Lance Fortnow: colleagues
Rakesh Vohra: colleagues