ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On characterizations of truthful mechanisms for combinatorial auctions and scheduling
Full text PdfPdf (266 KB)
Source
Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Chicago, Il, USA
SESSION: Characterizing incentive compatibility table of contents
Pages 38-47  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-169-9
Authors
Shahar Dobzinski  Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
Mukund Sundararajan  Stanford, Stanford, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1386790.1386798
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We characterize truthful mechanisms in two multi-parameter domains. The first characterization shows that every mechanism for combinatorial auctions with two subadditive bidders that always allocates all items is an affine maximizer. The second result shows that every truthful machine scheduling mechanism for 2 unrelated machines that yields a finite approximation of the minimum makespan, must be task independent. That is, the mechanism must determine the allocation of each job separately.

The characterizations improve our understanding of these multi-parameter settings and have new implications regarding the approximability of central problems in algorithmic mechanism design.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
George Christodoulou, Elias Koutsoupias, and AnnamáriaKovács. Mechanism design for fractional scheduling on unrelated machines. In ICALP'07.
 
4
 
5
Shahar Dobzinski. Two randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions. In APPROX-RANDOM, 2007.
6
7
8
9
 
10
 
11
Andrew Goldberg, Jason Hartline, Anna Karlin, Mike Saks, and AndrewWright. Competitive auctions. Games and Economic Behaviour, 2006.
 
12
Ron Lavi. Computationally efficient approximation mechanisms. In Algorithmic Game Theory, edited by Noam Nisan and Tim Roughgarden and Eva Tardos and Vijay Vazirani.
 
13
 
14
 
15
R. B. Myerson. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1):58--73, 1981.
16
17
 
18
Kevin Roberts. The characterization of implementable choise rules. In Jean-Jacques Laffont, editor, Aggregation and Revelation of Preferences. Papers presented at the first European Summer Workshop of the Economic Society, pages 321--349. North-Holland, 1979.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Shahar Dobzinski: colleagues
Mukund Sundararajan: colleagues