ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Continuous visual vocabulary modelsfor pLSA-based scene recognition
Full text PdfPdf (965 KB)
Source
Conference On Image And Video Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Content-based image and video retrieval table of contents
Niagara Falls, Canada
POSTER SESSION: Poster/reception table of contents
Pages 319-328  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-070-8
Authors
Eva Hörster  University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
Rainer Lienhart  University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
Malcolm Slaney  Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 132,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1386352.1386395
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Topic models such as probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA) and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) have been shown to perform well in various image content analysis tasks. However, due to the origin of these models from the text domain, almost all prior work uses discrete vocabularies even when applied in the image domain. Thus in these works the continuous local features used to describe an image need to be quantized to fit the model. In this work we will propose and evaluate three different extensions to the pLSA framework so that words are modeled as continuous feature vector distributions rather than crudely quantized high-dimensional descriptors. The performance of these continuous vocabulary models are compared in an automatic scene recognition task. Our experiments clearly show that the continuous approaches outperform the standard pLSA model. In this paper all required equations for parameter estimation and inference are given for each of the three models.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Ahrendt, C. Goutte, and J. Larsen. Co-occurrence models in music genre classification. In IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, pages 247--252, 2005.
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
A. Bosch, A. Zisserman, and X. Munoz. Scene classification via pLSA. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 2006.
 
6
L. Cao and L. Fei-Fei. Spatially coherent latent topic model for concurrent object segmentation and classification. In IEEE Intern. Conf. on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2007.
 
7
A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 39(1):1--38, 1977.
 
8
9
 
10
D. Larlus and F. Jurie. Latent mixture vocabularies for object categorization. In British Machine Vision Conference, 2006.
 
11
 
12
R. Lienhart and M. Slaney. pLSA on large scale image databases. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2007.
 
13
R. Lienhart and M. Slaney. pLSA on large scale image databases. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2007.
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
A. Vailaya, M. Figueiredo, A. Jain, and H. Zhang. Image classification for content-based indexing. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10(1):117--130, 2001.
 
19
J. Vogel and B. Schiele. Natural scene retrieval based on a semantic modeling step. In CIVR, pages 207--215, 2004.
 
20
S. Young. A review of large-vocabulary continuous-speech recognition. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 13(5):45--57, 1996.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Eva Hörster: colleagues
Rainer Lienhart: colleagues
Malcolm Slaney: colleagues