|
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a semi-supervised learning (SSL) approach to find similarities of images using statistics of local matches. SSL algorithms are well known for leveraging a large amount of unlabeled data as well as a small amount of labeled data to boost classification performance. Our approach proposes to formulate the problem of matching two images as an SSL based classification problem of image pairs with a minimal amount of labeled pairs. We apply a Gaussian random field model to represent each image pair as vertices in a weighted graph and the optimal configuration of the field is obtained by harmonic energy minimization. A symmetrical feature selection criterion is first introduced to select robust matches of local keypoints between two images. The Mallows distance is then adopted to combine multiple cues from statistics of local matches. Our experiments confirm that our SSL based approach not only boost classification performance but also improve robustness of the learned category model using only simple local keypoint features.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
W.J. Christmas, J. Kittler, and M. Petrou. Matching of Road Segments Using Probabilistic Relaxation: reducing the computational requirements. Imaging and Vision for control and guidance of aerospace vehicles, 2004.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. CVPR, 2003.
|
| |
6
|
L. Grady and G. Funka-Lea. Multi-label image segmentation for medical applications based on graph-theoretic electrical potentials. ECCV Workshop, 2004.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
T. Hertz, N. Shental, A. Bar-Hillel, and D. Weinshall. Enhancing image and video retrieval: Learning via equivalence constraints. CVPR, 2003.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
H. Kuck, P. Carbonetto, and N. de Freitas. A constrained semi-supervised learning approach to data association. ECCV, 2004.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
C. L. Mallows. A note on asymptotic joint normality. Annals of Math. Stat., 1972.
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
J. Ros, C. Laurent, and G. Lefebvre. A cascade of unsupervised and supervised neural networks for natural image classification. CIVR, 2006.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
J. Sivic, B. C. Russell, A. A. Efros, A. Zisserman, and W. T.Freeman. Discovering object categories in image collections, 2005. MIT-CSAIL-TR-2005-012.
|
| |
22
|
J. Stottinger, J. Amores, N. Sebe, A. Hanbury, N. Boujemaa, and T. Gevers. Object categorisation with color interest points. CIVR, Demo, 2007.
|
| |
23
|
Q. Tian, J. Yu, Q. Xue, and N. Sebe. A new analysis of the value of unlabeled data in semi-supervised learning for image retrieval. ICME, 2004.
|
| |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
W. Zhao, Y.G. Jiang, and C.W. Ngo. Keyframe retrieval by keypoints: Can point to point matching help?. CIVR, 2006.
|
| |
28
|
W. Zhao, Y.G. Jiang, and C.W. Ngo. Keyframe retrieval by keypoints: Can point to point matching help?. CIVR, 2006.
|
| |
29
|
X.J. Zhu, Z. Ghahramani, and J. Lafferty. Semi-supervised learning using gaussian fields and harmonic functions. ICML, 2003.
|
|