ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Semantics of dynamic structure event-based systems
Full text PdfPdf (187 KB)
Source Distributed event-based systems; Vol. 332 archive
Proceedings of the second international conference on Distributed event-based systems table of contents
Rome, Italy
SESSION: Modeling event based systems table of contents
Pages 245-252  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-090-6
Author
Fernando J. Barros  Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Sponsors
: IEEE
: ACM
: USENIX
IFIP : International Federation for Information Processing
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 103,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1385989.1386020
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the semantics of the Heterogeneous Flow System Specification (HFSS). HFSS is a modular formalism able to describe hierarchical event-based systems with a time-varying structure. While using a traditional representation of discrete event systems it introduces the concept of generalized sampling to achieve a description of continuous signals on digital computers. Sampling is treated as a first order concept being explicitly supported. While push event-based systems can be formalized by discrete event systems, sampling is consider here as a formalization of pull event-based systems. We introduce the new concepts of basic and network HFSS components to describe the semantics of the corresponding HFSS models.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
F. Barros. Towards a theory of continuous flow models. International Journal of General Systems, 31(1):29--39, 2002.
 
3
F. Barros. Describing the HLA using the DFSS formalism. In Artificial Intelligence and Simulation: 13th International Conference on AI, Simulation and Planning in High Autonomy Systems, LNAI 3397, pages 117--127. Springer, 2004.
 
4
F. Barros. Representing synchronous variable stepsize integration algorithms in the HFSS formalism. In Conceptual Modeling and Simulation Conference, pages 77--82, 2005.
 
5
 
6
 
7
R. Dorf, M. Ferren, and C. Phillips. Adaptive sampling frequency for sampled-data control systems. IRE Transactions on Automatic Control, 7(1):38--47, 1962.
 
8
R. Goldblatt. Lectures on the Hyperreals: An Introduction to Nonstandard Analysis. Springer, New York, 1998.
 
9
O. M. Group. Event service specification. Technical Report 04-10-02, OMG, 2004.
 
10
 
11
 
12
F. Kratz, O. Sokolsky, G. Pappas, and I. Lee. R-Charon: A modeling language for reconfigurable hybrid systems. In Hybrid Systems Computation and Control, volume 3972 of LNCS, pages 392--406, 2006.
 
13
14
 
15
E. Lee and H. Zheng. Operational semantics of hybrid systems. In Hybrid Systems Computation and Control, volume 3414 of LNCS, pages 392--406, 2005.
 
16
 
17
 
18
H. Praehofer. System Theoretic Foundations for Combined Discrete-Continuous System Simulation. Ph.d. diss., University of Linz, 1991.
19
 
20
US Modeling and Simulation Office. High Level Architecture Run Time Infrastructure, 2001.
 
21
XJ Technologies. AnyLogic: Users Manual, 2005.
 
22