|
ABSTRACT
With steady improvement in the reliability and performance of communication devices, routing instabilities now contribute to many of the remaining service degradations and interruptions in modern networks. This has led to a renewed interest in centralized routing systems that, compared to distributed routing, can provide greater control over routing decisions and better visibility of the results. One benefit of centralized control is the opportunity to readily eliminate transient routing loops, which arise frequently after network changes because of inconsistent routing states across devices. Translating this conceptual simplicity into a solution with tolerable message complexity is non-trivial. Addressing this issue is the focus of this paper. We identify when and why avoiding transient loops might require a significant number of messages in a centralized routing system, and demonstrate that this is the case under many common failure scenarios. We also establish that minimizing the number of required messages is NP-hard, and propose a greedy heuristic that we show to perform well under many conditions. The paper's results can facilitate the deployment and evaluation of centralized architectures by leveraging their strengths without incurring unacceptable overhead.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Albrightson, R., Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J., and Boyle, J. EIGRP--A fast routing protocol based on distance vectors. In Proc. Network/Interop (Las Vegas, NV, May 1994).
|
 |
2
|
Nick Feamster , Hari Balakrishnan , Jennifer Rexford , Aman Shaikh , Jacobus van der Merwe, The case for separating routing from routers, Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Future directions in network architecture, August 30-30, 2004, Portland, Oregon, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1016707.1016709]
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Francois, P., Bonaventure, O., Shand, M., Bryant, S., and Privedi, S. Loop-free convergence using oFIB. Internet draft, February 2008. Work in progress, revision 02.
|
| |
5
|
Fu, J., Sjödin, P., and Karlsson, G. Loop-free updates of forwarding tables. Tech. rep., Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Aug. 2007. Accepted in IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management (TNSM).
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
Albert Greenberg , Gisli Hjalmtysson , David A. Maltz , Andy Myers , Jennifer Rexford , Geoffrey Xie , Hong Yan , Jibin Zhan , Hui Zhang, A clean slate 4D approach to network control and management, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, v.35 n.5, October 2005
[doi> 10.1145/1096536.1096541]
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Meyer, D., et al. University of Oregon Route Views project. http://www.routeviews.org.
|
| |
11
|
Peterson, H., Sen, S., Chandrashekhar, J., Gao, L., Guerin, R., and Zhang, Z.-L. Message-efficient dissemination for loop-free centralized routing. Tech. rep., University of Minnesota Department of Computer Science, 2008. http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~peterson/tr-dddd-2008-01.pdf.
|
| |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
Yan, H., Maltz, D. A., Ng, T. S. E., Gogineni, H., Zhang, H., and Cai, Z. Tesseract: A 4D network control plane. In Proceedings of USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI '07) (2007).
|
|