ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Going SOLO to assess novice programmers
Full text PdfPdf (273 KB)
Source
Annual Joint Conference Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education table of contents
Madrid, Spain
SESSION: Assessment table of contents
Pages 209-213  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-078-4
Also published in ...
Authors
Judy Sheard  Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Angela Carbone  Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Raymond Lister  Univesity of Technology, Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Beth Simon  University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
Errol Thompson  Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Jacqueline L. Whalley  Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
Sponsors
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 86,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1384271.1384328
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the programming knowledge of novices using Biggs' SOLO taxonomy. It builds on previous work of Lister et al. (2006) and addresses some of the criticisms of that work. The research was conducted by studying the exam scripts for 120 introductory programming students, in which three specific questions were analyzed using the SOLO taxonomy. The study reports the following four findings: when the instruction to students used by Lister et al. - "In plain English, explain what the following segment of Java code does" - is replaced with a less ambiguous instruction, many students still provide multistructural responses; students are relatively consistent in the SOLO level of their answers; student responses on SOLO reading tasks correlate positively with performance on writing tasks; postgraduates students manifest a higher level of thinking than undergraduates.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adelson, B. When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 3 (1984), 483--495.
 
2
Biggs, J. B. & Collis, K. F. Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York, Academic Press, 1982.
3
 
4
McKeithen, K., Reitman, J.., Rueter, H., & Hirtle, S. (1981). Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers. Canadian J. of Psychology, 13, 307--325.
 
5


Collaborative Colleagues:
Judy Sheard: colleagues
Angela Carbone: colleagues
Raymond Lister: colleagues
Beth Simon: colleagues
Errol Thompson: colleagues
Jacqueline L. Whalley: colleagues