ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The originality glut
Full text PdfPdf (316 KB)
Source
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin archive
Volume 40 ,  Issue 2  (June 2008) table of contents
COLUMN: CS research table of contents
Pages 14-15  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:0097-8418
Author
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 64,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1383602.1383610
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Originality is over-rated in computing education research. We have a world-wide glut of originality.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Dehnadi, S. and R. Bornat. (2006) The camel has two humps. http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/research/PhDArea/saeed/paper1.pdf {Accessed February 2008}.
 
3
Dehnadi, S. (2006), Testing Programming Aptitude, in P. Romero, J. Good, E. A. Chaparro & S. Bryant, eds, Proceedings of the PPIG 18th Annual Workshop, pp. 22--37. http://www.ppig.org/papers/18th-dehnadi.pdf {Accessed February 2008}.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8