ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Ordinal embeddings of minimum relaxation: General properties, trees, and ultrametrics
Full text PdfPdf (169 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 4  (August 2008) table of contents
Article No. 46  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1549-6325
Authors
Noga Alon  Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Mihai Bădoiu  Google Inc., NY, USA
Erik D. Demaine  MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
Martin Farach-Colton  Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
Mohammadtaghi Hajiaghayi  AT&T Labs——Research, Florham Park, NJ, USA
Anastasios Sidiropoulos  MIT, Florham Park, Cambridge, MA, USA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 88,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1383369.1383377
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We introduce a new notion of embedding, called minimum-relaxation ordinal embedding, parallel to the standard notion of minimum-distortion (metric) embedding. In an ordinal embedding, it is the relative order between pairs of distances, and not the distances themselves, that must be preserved as much as possible. The (multiplicative) relaxation of an ordinal embedding is the maximum ratio between two distances whose relative order is inverted by the embedding. We develop several worst-case bounds and approximation algorithms on ordinal embedding. In particular, we establish that ordinal embedding has many qualitative differences from metric embedding, and we capture the ordinal behavior of ultrametrics and shortest-path metrics of unweighted trees.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Babilon, R., Matoušek, J., Maxová, J., and Valtr, P. 2003. Low-distortion embeddings of trees. J. Graph Algor. Appl. 7, 4, 399--409.
 
5
 
6
 
7
Barthelemy, J.-P., and Guenoche, A. 1991. Trees and Proximity Representations. John Wiley.
 
8
Bilu, Y., and Linial, N. 2004. Monotone maps, sphericity and bounded second eigenvalue. arXiv:math.CO/0401293.
 
9
Bourgain, J. 1985. On Lipschitz embedding of finite metric spaces in Hilbert space. Israel J. Math. 52, 1-2, 46--52.
 
10
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
Cunningham, J. P., and Shepard, R. N. 1974. Monotone mapping of similarities into a general metric space. J. Math. Psych. 11, 335--364.
 
15
Erdős, P., and Sachs, H. 1963. Reguläre Graphen gegebener Taillenweite mit minimaler Knotenzahl. Wiss. Z. Martin-Luther-Univ. Halle-Wittenberg Math.-Natur. Reihe 12, 251--257.
16
 
17
Farach, M., Kannan, S., and Warnow, T. 1995. A robust model for finding optimal evolutionary trees. Algorithmica 13, 1-2, 155--179.
 
18
Gupta, A. 2000. Embedding tree metrics into low-dimensional Euclidean spaces. Discrete Comput. Geom. 24, 1, 105--116.
 
19
Harding, E. F. 1966/1967. The number of partitions of a set of N points in k dimensions induced by hyperplanes. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, Series II 15, 285--289.
 
20
 
21
Holman, W. 1972. The relation between hierarchical and euclidean models for psychological distances. Psychometrika 37, 4, 417--423.
 
22
Indyk, P., and Matoušek, J. 2004. Low-distortion embeddings of finite metric spaces. In Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, 2nd Ed., J. E. Goodman and J. O'Rourke, Eds. CRC Press, Chap. 8, 177--196.
 
23
Ivansson, L. 2000. Computational aspects of radiation hybrid. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, Royal Institute of Technology.
 
24
Johnson, W. B., and Lindenstrauss, J. 1984. Extensions of lipshitz mapping into hilbert space. Contemp. Math. 26, 189--206.
 
25
Kruskal, J. B. 1964a. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29, 1--28.
 
26
Kruskal, J. B. 1964b. Non-metric multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika 29, 115--129.
 
27
Lee, J. R., and Naor, A. 2004. Embedding the diamond graph in Lp and dimension reduction in L1. Geome. Funct. Anal. 14, 4, 745--747.
 
28
Linial, N., London, E., and Rabinovich, Y. 1995. The geometry of graphs and some of its algorithmic applications. Combinatorica 15, 2, 215--245.
 
29
Matoušek, J. 1990. Bi-Lipschitz embeddings into low-dimensional Euclidean spaces. Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae 31, 3, 589--600.
 
30
Matoušek, J. 1997. On embedding expanders into lp spaces. Israel Journal of Mathematics 102, 189--197.
 
31
Opatrny, J. 1979. Total ordering problem. SIAM J. Comput. 8, 111--114.
 
32
Shah, R., and Farach-Colton, M. 2004. On the complexity of ordinal clustering. J. Classification. To appear.
 
33
Shepard, R. N. 1962. Multidimensional scaling with unknown distance function I. Psychometrika 27, 125--140.
 
34
Torgerson, W. S. 1952. Multidimensional scaling I: Theory and method. Psychometrika 17, 4, 401--414.
 
35
Warren, H. E. 1968. Lower bounds for approximation by nonlinear manifolds. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 133, 167--178.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Noga Alon: colleagues
Mihai Bădoiu: colleagues
Erik D. Demaine: colleagues
Martin Farach-Colton: colleagues
Mohammadtaghi Hajiaghayi: colleagues
Anastasios Sidiropoulos: colleagues