ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Improved algorithms for optimal embeddings
Full text PdfPdf (262 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 4  (August 2008) table of contents
Article No. 45  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1549-6325
Authors
Nishanth Chandran  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Ryan Moriarty  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Rafail Ostrovsky  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Omkant Pandey  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Mohammad Ali Safari  University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
Amit Sahai  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 102,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1383369.1383376
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the last decade, the notion of metric embeddings with small distortion has received wide attention in the literature, with applications in combinatorial optimization, discrete mathematics, and bio-informatics. The notion of embedding is, given two metric spaces on the same number of points, to find a bijection that minimizes maximum Lipschitz and bi-Lipschitz constants. One reason for the popularity of the notion is that algorithms designed for one metric space can be applied to a different one, given an embedding with small distortion. The better distortion, the better the effectiveness of the original algorithm applied to a new metric space.

The goal recently studied by Kenyon et al. [2004] is to consider all possible embeddings between two finite metric spaces and to find the best possible one; that is, consider a single objective function over the space of all possible embeddings that minimizes the distortion. In this article we continue this important direction. In particular, using a theorem of Albert and Atkinson [2005], we are able to provide an algorithm to find the optimal bijection between two line metrics, provided that the optimal distortion is smaller than 13.602. This improves the previous bound of 3 + 2&sqrt;2, solving an open question posed by Kenyon et al. [2004]. Further, we show an inherent limitation of algorithms using the “forbidden pattern” based dynamic programming approach, in that they cannot find optimal mapping if the optimal distortion is more than 7 + 4&sqrt;3 (≃ 13.928). Thus, our results are almost optimal for this method. We also show that previous techniques for general embeddings apply to a (slightly) more general class of metrics.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Albert, M. H., and Atkinson, M. D. 2005. Simple permutations and pattern restricted permutations. Discr. Math. 300, 1-3, 1--15.
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
Chinn, P., Chvatalova, J., Dewdney, A., and Gibbs, N. 1982. The bandwidth problem for graphs and matrices—A survey. J. Graph Theory 6, 223--254.
9
 
10
Fortin, S. 1996. The graph isomorphism problem. Tech. Rep. 96-20, University of Alberta, Edomonton, Alberta, Canada.
 
11
Hall, A., and Papadimitriou, C. 2005. Approximating the distoriton. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Randomization and Approximation Techniques (RANDOM APPROX). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3624. Springer, 111--122.
12
 
13
 
14
Johnson, W., and Lindenstrauss, J. 2003. Handbook of Geometry of Banach Spaces. North-Holland.
15
 
16
Kruskal, J. 1964a. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Pyschometrika 29, 1--27.
 
17
Kruskal, J. 1964b. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Pyschometrika 29, 115--129.
 
18
Linial, N. 2002. Finite metric spaces—Combinatorics, geometry and algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians III, 573--586.
 
19
 
20
 
21
Shepard, R. 1962a. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function 1. Pyschometrika 27, 125--140.
 
22
Shepard, R. 1962b. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function 2. Pyschometrika 27, 216--246.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Nishanth Chandran: colleagues
Ryan Moriarty: colleagues
Rafail Ostrovsky: colleagues
Omkant Pandey: colleagues
Mohammad Ali Safari: colleagues
Amit Sahai: colleagues