| Improved algorithms for optimal embeddings |
| Full text |
Pdf
(262 KB)
|
Source
|
ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)
archive
Volume 4 , Issue 4 (August 2008)
table of contents
Article No. 45
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1549-6325
|
|
Authors
|
|
Nishanth Chandran
|
University of California, Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Ryan Moriarty
|
University of California, Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Rafail Ostrovsky
|
University of California, Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Omkant Pandey
|
University of California, Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Mohammad Ali Safari
|
University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
|
|
Amit Sahai
|
University of California, Los Angeles, CA
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7, Downloads (12 Months): 102, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
In the last decade, the notion of metric embeddings with small distortion has received wide attention in the literature, with applications in combinatorial optimization, discrete mathematics, and bio-informatics. The notion of embedding is, given two metric spaces on the same number of points, to find a bijection that minimizes maximum Lipschitz and bi-Lipschitz constants. One reason for the popularity of the notion is that algorithms designed for one metric space can be applied to a different one, given an embedding with small distortion. The better distortion, the better the effectiveness of the original algorithm applied to a new metric space. The goal recently studied by Kenyon et al. [2004] is to consider all possible embeddings between two finite metric spaces and to find the best possible one; that is, consider a single objective function over the space of all possible embeddings that minimizes the distortion. In this article we continue this important direction. In particular, using a theorem of Albert and Atkinson [2005], we are able to provide an algorithm to find the optimal bijection between two line metrics, provided that the optimal distortion is smaller than 13.602. This improves the previous bound of 3 + 2&sqrt;2, solving an open question posed by Kenyon et al. [2004]. Further, we show an inherent limitation of algorithms using the “forbidden pattern” based dynamic programming approach, in that they cannot find optimal mapping if the optimal distortion is more than 7 + 4&sqrt;3 (≃ 13.928). Thus, our results are almost optimal for this method. We also show that previous techniques for general embeddings apply to a (slightly) more general class of metrics.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Albert, M. H., and Atkinson, M. D. 2005. Simple permutations and pattern restricted permutations. Discr. Math. 300, 1-3, 1--15.
|
 |
3
|
Mihai Bǎdoiu , Julia Chuzhoy , Piotr Indyk , Anastasios Sidiropoulos, Low-distortion embeddings of general metrics into the line, Proceedings of the thirty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, May 22-24, 2005, Baltimore, MD, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1060590.1060624]
|
| |
4
|
Mihai Bǎdoiu , Kedar Dhamdhere , Anupam Gupta , Yuri Rabinovich , Harald Räcke , R. Ravi , Anastasios Sidiropoulos, Approximation algorithms for low-distortion embeddings into low-dimensional spaces, Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, January 23-25, 2005, Vancouver, British Columbia
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Chinn, P., Chvatalova, J., Dewdney, A., and Gibbs, N. 1982. The bandwidth problem for graphs and matrices—A survey. J. Graph Theory 6, 223--254.
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Fortin, S. 1996. The graph isomorphism problem. Tech. Rep. 96-20, University of Alberta, Edomonton, Alberta, Canada.
|
| |
11
|
Hall, A., and Papadimitriou, C. 2005. Approximating the distoriton. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Randomization and Approximation Techniques (RANDOM APPROX). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3624. Springer, 111--122.
|
 |
12
|
Frank Hoffmann , Klaus Kriegel , Carola Wenk, Matching 2D patterns of protein spots, Proceedings of the fourteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry, p.231-239, June 07-10, 1998, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
[doi> 10.1145/276884.276911]
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
Johnson, W., and Lindenstrauss, J. 2003. Handbook of Geometry of Banach Spaces. North-Holland.
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Kruskal, J. 1964a. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Pyschometrika 29, 1--27.
|
| |
17
|
Kruskal, J. 1964b. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Pyschometrika 29, 115--129.
|
| |
18
|
Linial, N. 2002. Finite metric spaces—Combinatorics, geometry and algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians III, 573--586.
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
Shepard, R. 1962a. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function 1. Pyschometrika 27, 125--140.
|
| |
22
|
Shepard, R. 1962b. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function 2. Pyschometrika 27, 216--246.
|
|