ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Recovering from errors during programming by demonstration
Full text PdfPdf (1.23 MB)
Source
International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
Gran Canaria, Spain
SESSION: Example-based interfaces table of contents
Pages 159-168  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-987-6
Authors
Jiun-Hung Chen  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Daniel S. Weld  University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
AAAI : Association for the Advancement of Artifical Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 84,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1378773.1378794
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many end-users wish to customize their applications, automating common tasks and routines. Unfortunately, this automation is difficult today --- users must choose between brittle macros and complex scripting languages. Programming by demonstration (PBD) offers a middle ground, allowing users to demonstrate a procedure multiple times and generalizing the requisite behavior with machine learning. Unfortunately, many PBD systems are almost as brittle as macro recorders, offering few ways for a user to control the learning process or correct the demonstrations used as training examples. This paper presents CHINLE, a system which automatically constructs PBD systems for applications based on their interface specification. The resulting PBD systems have novel interaction and visualization methods, which allow the user to easily monitor and guide the learning process, facilitating error recovery during training. CHINLE-constructed PBD systems learn procedures with conditionals and perform partial learning if the procedure is too complex to learn completely.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Allen, N. Chambers, G. Ferguson, L. Galescu, H. Jung, M. Swift, and W. Taysom. Plow: A collaborative task learning agent. In Proc. of AAAI'07.
2
 
3
J. Blythe. An analysis of procedure learning by instruction. In Proc. of AAAI-05
4
 
5
C. A. Brewer. Color use guidelines for mapping and visualization. In A. MacEachren and D. Taylor, editors, Visualization in Modern Cartography, pages 123--147. Elsevier Science, 1994.
6
 
7
 
8
9
10
11
 
12
H. Hirsh. Theoretical underpinnings of version spaces. In Proc. of IJCAI'91.
 
13
14
15
16
 
17
18
 
19
 
20
L. Liao, D. Fox, and K. H. Location-based activity recognition using relational markov networks. In Procs. of IJCAI'05.
 
21
H. Lieberman. Your Wish is My Command: Giving Users the Power to Instruct their Software. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.
 
22
H. Lieberman. End User Development. Springer, 2006.
23
24
 
25
 
26
T. Mitchell. Generalization as search. Artificial Intelligence, 18:203--226, 1982.
27
28
 
29
I. H. Paynter, G. W. and Witten. Applying machine learning to programming by demonstration. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 16(3):161--188, 2004.
 
30
31
32


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jiun-Hung Chen: colleagues
Daniel S. Weld: colleagues