ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Virtual trip lines for distributed privacy-preserving traffic monitoring
Full text PdfPdf (1.39 MB)
Source
International Conference On Mobile Systems, Applications And Services archive
Proceeding of the 6th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services table of contents
Breckenridge, CO, USA
SESSION: Transportation sense table of contents
Pages 15-28  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-139-2
Authors
Baik Hoh  Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
Marco Gruteser  Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
Ryan Herring  UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Jeff Ban  California Center for Innovative Transportation, Berkeley, CA, USA
Daniel Work  UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Juan-Carlos Herrera  UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Alexandre M. Bayen  UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
Murali Annavaram  USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Quinn Jacobson  Nokia Research Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 46,   Downloads (12 Months): 333,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1378600.1378604
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Automotive traffic monitoring using probe vehicles with Global Positioning System receivers promises significant improvements in cost, coverage, and accuracy. Current approaches, however, raise privacy concerns because they require participants to reveal their positions to an external traffic monitoring server. To address this challenge, we propose a system based on virtual trip lines and an associated cloaking technique. Virtual trip lines are geographic markers that indicate where vehicles should provide location updates. These markers can be placed to avoid particularly privacy sensitive locations. They also allow aggregating and cloaking several location updates based on trip line identifiers, without knowing the actual geographic locations of these trip lines. Thus they facilitate the design of a distributed architecture, where no single entity has a complete knowledge of probe identities and fine-grained location information. We have implemented the system with GPS smartphone clients and conducted a controlled experiment with 20 phone-equipped drivers circling a highway segment. Results show that even with this low number of probe vehicles, travel time estimates can be provided with less than 15% error, and applying the cloaking techniques reduces travel time estimation accuracy by less than 5% compared to a standard periodic sampling approach.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
TeleNav. http://www.telenav.net/, 2004.
 
8
Inrix. http://www.inrix.com/, 2006.
 
9
Intellione. http://www.intellione.com/, 2006.
10
11
 
12
M. Annavaram, Q. Jacobson, and J. P. Shen. Hangout: A privacy preserving social networking application. In Proc. of International Workshop on Mobile Devices and Urban Sensing (to appear), St. Louis, USA, 2008.
 
13
X. Ban, R. Herring, J. Margulici, and A. Bayen. Optimal sensor placement for freeway travel time estimation. Interim technical report (available at http://www.calccit.org/resources/2008-pdf/OptSenDP_InterimReport_2008.pdf, California Center for Innovative Transportation, 2008. Revised version to be submitted to the 18th International Symposium on Traffic and Transportation Theory (ISTTT).
 
14
 
15
C. Bettini, X. SeanWang, and S. Jajodia. Protecting privacy against location-based personal identification,. In 2nd VLDB Workshop SDM, 2005.
 
16
D. Boneh, X. Boyen, and H. Shacham. Short group signatures. In CRYPTO 2004, volume 3152 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 41--55. Springer, 2004.
 
17
R. Cayford and T. Johnson. Operational parameters affecting the use of anonymous cell phone tracking for generating traffic information. Transportation Research Board 82nd Annual Meeting, 1(3):03--3865, 2003.
 
18
D. Chaum and E. V. Heyst. Group signatures. In Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPT '91, volume 547 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 257--265. Springer, 1991.
 
19
L. Chu, S. Oh, and W. Recker. Adaptive Kalman filter based freeway travel time estimation. In 84th TRB Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., January 9-13 2005. Transportation Research Board.
 
20
B. Coifman. Using dual loop speed traps to identify detector errors. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record 1683(-1):47--58, 1999.
 
21
B. Coifman. Improved velocity estimation using single loop detectors. Transportation Research Part A, 35(10):863--880, 2001.
 
22
X. Dai, M. Ferman, and R. Roesser. A simulation evaluation of a real-time traffic information system using probe vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, pages 475--480, 2003.
 
23
 
24
A.-M. Elliott. Tomtom announces tomtom high definition traffic. http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/news/news.phtml/11248/12272/TomTom-High-Definition-Traffic-announced.phtml, Nov 2007.
 
25
M. Ferman, D. Blumenfeld, and X. Dai. A simple analytical model of a probe-based traffic information system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, pages 263--268, 2003.
26
 
27
28
29
30
 
31
M. Gruteser and B. Hoh. On the anonymity of periodic location samples. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Security in Pervasive Computing, 2005.
 
32
F. Hall and B. Persaud. Evaluation of speed estimates made with single-detector data from freeway traffic management systems. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record 1232:9--16, 1989.
 
33
U. Hengartner. Hiding location information from location-based services. In Proc. of International Workshop on Privacy-Aware Location-based Mobile Services (PALMS), Mannheim, Germany, 2007.
 
34
J. Herrera and A. M. Bayen. Traffic flow reconstruction using mobile sensors and loop detector data. In 87th TRB Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., January 12-16 2008. Transportation Research Board.
 
35
 
36
37
38
 
39
Z. Jia, C. Chen, B. Coifman, and P. Varaiya. The PeMS algorithms for accurate, real-time estimates of g-factors and speeds from single-loop detectors. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(4):26--33, 2001.
 
40
 
41
H. Kargupta, S. Datta, Q. Wang, and K. Sivakumar. Random data perturbation techniques and privacy preserving data mining. In IEEE ICDM. IEEE Press, 2003.
 
42
L. Klein, M. Mills, and D. Gibson. Traffic Detector Handbook, volume 1 and 2. Third edition, October 2006.
 
43
 
44
J. Krumm. Inference attacks on location tracks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive 2007), May 2007.
45
 
46
 
47
B. Mikhalkin, H. Payne, and L. Isaksen. Estimation of speed from presence detectors. Highway Research Record, 388:73--83, 1972.
 
48
 
49
C. Nanthawichit, T. Nakatsuji, and H. Suzuki. Application of probe-vehicle data for real-time traffic-state estimation and short-term travel-time prediction on a freeway. Transportation Research Record, 1855:49--59, 2003.
 
50
H. Payne and S. Thompson. Malfunction detection and data repair for induction-loop sensors using i-880 data base. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record 1570(-1):191--201, 1997.
 
51
A. Pushkar, F. Hall, and J. Acha-Daza. Estimation of speeds from single-loop freeway flow and occupancy detectors using cusp catastrophy theory model. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record 1457:149--157, 1994.
 
52
D. Reid. An algorithm for tracking multiple targets. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 24(6):843--854, Dec 1979.
 
53
P. Samarati and L. Sweeney. Protecting privacy when disclosing information: k-anonymity and its enforcement through generalization and suppression. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, 1998.
 
54
K. Sampigethaya, L. Huang, M. Li, R. Poovendran, K. Matsuura, and K. Sezaki. Caravan: Providing location privacy for vanet. In 3rd workshop on Embedded Security in Cars (ESCAR2005), 2005.
 
55
B. Smith, H. Zhang, M. Fontaine, and M. Green. Cell phone probes as an ATMS tool. Research Report UVACTS-15-5-79, June 2003.
 
56
 
57
U. o. M. Transportation Studies Center. Final Evaluation Report for the CAPITAL-ITS Operational Test and Demonstration Program. Transportation Studies Center, University of Maryland, 1997.
58
59
 
60
G. Zhong, I. Goldberg, and U. Hengartner. Louis, lester and pierre: Three protocols for location privacy. In Privacy Enhancing Technologies, pages 62--76, 2007.

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Baik Hoh: colleagues
Marco Gruteser: colleagues
Ryan Herring: colleagues
Jeff Ban: colleagues
Daniel Work: colleagues
Juan-Carlos Herrera: colleagues
Alexandre M. Bayen: colleagues
Murali Annavaram: colleagues
Quinn Jacobson: colleagues