|
ABSTRACT
Graph augmentation theory is a general framework for analyzing navigability in social networks. It is known that, for large classes of graphs, there exist augmentations of these graphs such that greedy routing according to the shortest path metric performs in polylogarithmic expected number of steps. However, it is also known that there are classes of graphs for which no augmentations can enable greedy routing according to the shortest path metric to perform better than Ω(n1/√log n) expected number of steps. In fact, the best known universal bound on the greedy diameter of arbitrary graph is essentially n1/3. That is, for any graph, there is an augmentation such that greedy routing according to the shortest path metric performs in Õ(n1/3) expected number of steps. Hence, greedy routing according to the shortest path metric has at least two drawbacks. First, it is in general space-consuming to encode locally the shortest path distances to all the other nodes, and, second, greedy routing according to the shortest path metric performs poorly in some graphs. We prove that, using semimetrics of small stretch results in a huge positive impact, in both encoding space and efficiency of greedy routing. More precisely, we show that, for any connected n-node graph G and any integer k ≥ 1, there exist an augmentation φ of G and a semimetric μ on G with stretch 2/k-1 such that greedy routing according to μ performs in O(k2 n2/klog2n) expected number of steps. As a corollary, we get that for any connected n-node graph G, there exist an augmentation φ of G and a semimetric μ on G with stretch O(log n) such that greedy routing according to μ performs in polylogarithmic expected number of steps. This latter semimetric can be encoded locally at every node using only a polylogarithmic number of bits.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
S. Banerjee, T. Griffin, and M. Pias. The interdomain connectivity of PlanetLab nodes. In 5th Workshop on Passive and Active Measurements,LNCS 3015, pp. 73--82, Springer, 2004.
|
| |
6
|
D. Barbella, G. Kachergis, D. Liben-Nowell, A. Sallstrom, and B. Sowell. Depth of field and cautious-greedy routing in social networks. In 18th International Symp. on Algo. and Computation (ISAAC), LNCS 4835, pp. 574--586. Springer, 2007.
|
| |
7
|
A. Clauset and C. Moore How Do Networks Become Navigable? http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0309415v2.
|
| |
8
|
P. Dodds, R. Muhamad, and D. Watts. An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science 301, no5634, pp. 827--829, 2003.
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
Philippe Duchon , Nicolas Hanusse , Emmanuelle Lebhar , Nicolas Schabanel, Towards small world emergence, Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures, July 30-August 02, 2006, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1148109.1148145]
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
M. Flammini, L. Moscardelli, A. Navarra, and S. Perennes. Asymptotically optimal solutions for small world graphs. In 19th International Symp. on Distributed Computing (DISC), LNCS 3724, Springer, pp. 414--428, 2005.
|
| |
15
|
P. Fraigniaud. Greedy Routing in Tree-Decomposed Graphs. In 13th Europ. Symp. on Algo. (ESA), LNCS 3669, Springer, pp. 791--802, 2005.
|
| |
16
|
P. Fraigniaud. Small Worlds as Navigable Augmented Networks: Model, Analysis, and Validation. In 15th Europ. Symp. on Algo. (ESA), LNCS 4698, Springer, pp. 2--11, 2007.
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
Pierre Fraigniaud , Cyril Gavoille , Adrian Kosowski , Emmanuelle Lebhar , Zvi Lotker, Universal augmentation schemes for network navigability: overcoming the √n-barrier, Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures, June 09-11, 2007, San Diego, California, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1248377.1248379]
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
P. Fraigniaud, E. Lebhar, and L. Viennot. The inframetric model for the internet. In 27th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), 2008.
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
J. Kleinberg. Complex networks and decentralized search algorithm. Nevanlinna prize presentation at the International Congress of Mathematicians (ICM), Madrid, 2006.
|
| |
23
|
E. Lebhar, and N. Schabanel. Searching for Optimal paths in long-range contact networks. In 31st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages andProgramming (ICALP), LNCS 3142, pp. 894--905, 2004.
|
 |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
S. Milgram. The Small-World Problem. Psychology Today, pp. 60--67, 1967.
|
| |
28
|
D. Peleg. Private communication. Workshop of COST Action 295 "DYNAMO", Les Ménuires, Jan. 2006.
|
| |
29
|
O. Sandberg. Neighbor Selection and Hitting Probability in Small-World Graphs. Annals of Applied Probability (to appear).
|
 |
30
|
|
 |
31
|
|
CITED BY
|
|
Pierre Fraigniaud , Cyril Gavoille , Adrian Kosowski , Emmanuelle Lebhar , Zvi Lotker, Universal augmentation schemes for network navigability, Theoretical Computer Science, v.410 n.21-23, p.1970-1981, May, 2009
|
|