Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

The implementation of statically typed programming languages on the .NET Common Language Infrastructure (CLI) is by now well understood (Gough 2002). However, the situation with dynamic languages is not so clear. Typically such languages have objects that are dynamically typed, while the CLI is statically typed at the instruction code level. Nevertheless there is a growing body of evidence suggesting that the CLI can be a suitable target for such languages (Hugunin 2006). In order to better understand the issues involved we set out to create a full implementation of the Ruby language on the CLI. This paper describes the challenges faced and design decisions made in creating Ruby.NET -- a Ruby compiler for the CLI.

REFERENCES

• 1: John John Gough , K. John Gough, Compiling for the .Net Common Language Runtime, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001
• 2: Hugunin, J. Jim Hugunin's Thinking Dynamic, http://blogs.msdn.com/hugunin/archive/2006/09/05/741605.aspx, Accessed 18 October 2007.
• 3: Ironruby, A fast, compliant Ruby powered by .NET, http://www.ironruby.net/, Accessed 18 October 2007.
• 4: Jruby, Java powered Ruby Implementation, http://jruby.codehaus.org/, Accessed 18 October 2007.
• 5: Kelly, W. Gardens Point Parser Generator. http://www.plas.fit.qut.edu.au/gppg, Accessed 18 October 2007.
• 6: Lam J, RubyCLR, http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubyclr/, Accessed 18 October 2007.
• 7: Jim S. Miller , Susann Ragsdale, The Common Language Infrastructure Annotated Standard, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2003
• 8: Ruby. Ruby Language home page, http://www.rubylang.org, Accessed 18 October 2007.
• 9: Sarada K, Yarv: Yet Another Ruby VM, http://www.atdot.net/yarv/, Accessed 18 October 2007.
• 10: Thomas, D, Fowler, C & Hunt, A. Programming Ruby, 2nd Edition, Pragmatic Bookshelf, 2004

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
.NET and compilers, CLI, Ruby, dynamic languages