|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
Phrasal input is a Chinese text entry feature and just available on mobile phone lately. In the study, we compared usability of five Chinese pinyin phrasal input methods (Cstar, Guobi, Nokia, T9 and Zi) on mobile phones that represent two types: methods derived from PC pinyin phrasal input and methods derived from pinyin character input on mobile phones. The result showed that Cstar and Nokia performed the best followed by Guobi, T9, and Zi in order. We discussed the reasons behind and provided four design guidelines: 1) Find a balance between radical designs and well-accepted designs; 2) Optimize the corpus constantly; 3) Provide easy-to-use on-line phrase creation; and 4) Design a phrasal input method excluding pinyin selection process as PC pinyin phrasal input methods do. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||