ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Development and evaluation of multidimensional tactons for a wearable tactile display
Full text PdfPdf (248 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 309 archive
Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services table of contents
Singapore
Pages 186-189  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-862-6
Authors
Pierre Barralon  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Ginna Ng  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Guy Dumont  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Stephan K. W. Schwarz  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Mark Ansermino  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1377999.1378005
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We developed a novel wearable tactile display system as an alternative to the visual and audio displays routinely used by anesthesiologists to monitor patients in the operating room (OR). Visual displays and auditory alarms can be distracting or insufficient in their alarm transmission whereas a tactile display, which utilizes the sense of touch, can act as an effective conduit for alert delivery. A sophisticated alarm scheme is essential to convey the complex array of physiological information available in current monitoring systems; therefore, to report all relevant alerts to the attending anesthesiologist, it is essential that an augmenting or replacement display system be at least as effective and efficacious as conventional systems. Using multidimensional Tactons, we designed a tactile alert scheme consisting of 36 unique stimuli and evaluated the accuracy and response time in stimuli recognition using a tactile prototype worn as a belt. We observed an overall accuracy of 81% and a response time of 4.8 seconds. 4.18 bits (18.07 tokens) of messages were successfully communicated without loss of information. These results demonstrate that the novel tactile display represents an effective and potentially work-load-reducing method to convey vital information non-visually and non-aurally.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
R. Cholewiak and A. Collins. Vibrotactile localization on the arm: Effects of place, space and age. 65(7):1058--1077, 2003.
 
5
E. Coiera, V. Tombs, and T. Clutton-Brock. Attentional overload as a fundamental cause of human error in monitoring. Technical report, Hewlett Packard Laboratories Technical Report, 1996.
 
6
S. Ford, J. Daniels, J. Lim, V. Koval, S. K. Schwarz, G. Dumont, and M. J. Ansermino. Touch your patient - a human simulation centre based assessment of a novel vibrotactile display. In Society for Technology in Anesthesia, 2007.
 
7
J. Y. C. Ng, J. C. F. Man, S. Fels, G. Dumont, and J. M. Ansermino. An evaluation of a vibro-tactile display prototype for physiological monitoring. Anesth Analg, 101(6):1719--1724, Dec 2005.
 
8
A. Stölle, R. Hözl, D. Kleinböl, A. Mrsic, and H. Tan. Measuring poing localization errors in spatiotemporal tactile stimulus patterns. In EuroHaptics, pages 512--515, 2004.
 
9
H. Z. Tan, N. I. Durlach, C. M. Reed, and W. M. Rabinowitz. Information transmission with a multifinger tactual display. Percept Psychophys, 61(6):993--1008, Aug 1999.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Pierre Barralon: colleagues
Ginna Ng: colleagues
Guy Dumont: colleagues
Stephan K. W. Schwarz: colleagues
Mark Ansermino: colleagues