ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Tighter bounds for random projections of manifolds
Full text PdfPdf (425 KB)
Source
Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
College Park, MD, USA
SESSION: 2A table of contents
Pages 39-48  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-071-5
Author
Kenneth L. Clarkson  IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 68,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1377676.1377685
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Johnson-Lindenstrauss random projection lemma gives a simple way to reduce the dimensionality of a set of points while approximately preserving their pairwise distances. The most direct application of the lemma applies to a finite set of points, but recent work has extended the technique to affine subspaces, curves, and general smooth manifolds. Here the case of random projection of smooth manifolds is considered, and a previous analysis is sharpened, reducing the dependence on such properties as the manifold's maximum curvature.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
R. Baraniuk and M. Wakin. Random projections of smooth manifolds. to appear, Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 2006.
4
 
5
R. M. Dudley. Metric entropy of some classes of sets with differentiable boundaries. J. Approximation Theory, 10:227--236, 1974.
 
6
 
7
P. M. Gruber. Asymptotic estimates for best and stepwise approximation of convex bodies I. Forum Math., 5:281--297, 1993.
 
8
C. Hegde, M. B. Wakin, and R. G. Baraniuk. Random projections for manifold learning. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), December 2007.
 
9
 
10
P. Indyk and J. Matoušek. Low-distortion embeddings of finite metric spaces, pages 177--196. CRC Press, 2004.
11
 
12
W. B. Johnson and J. Lindenstrauss. Extensions of Lipschitz mapping into Hilbert space. Contemporary Mathematics, 26:189--206, 1984.
 
13
N. Linial. Finite metric spaces: combinatorics, geometry, and algorithms. In International Congress of Mathematicians III, pages 573--586, 2002.
 
14
 
15
H. Pottmann, T. Steiner, M. Hofer, C. Haider, and A. Hanbury. The isophotic metric and its application to feature sensitive morphology on surfaces. In T. Pajdla and J. Matas, editors, Computer Vision - ECCV 2004, Part IV, volume 3024 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 560--572. Springer, 2004.
 
16
 
17
S. Vempala. The Random Projection Method, volume 65 of Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science. American Mathematical Society, 2004.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Kenneth L. Clarkson: colleagues