ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Query evaluation with soft-key constraints
Full text PdfPdf (283 KB)
Source
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems archive
Proceedings of the twenty-seventh ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems table of contents
Vancouver, Canada
SESSION: Uncertain & probabilistic data table of contents
Pages 119-128  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-152-1
Authors
Abhay Jha  CSE, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Vibhor Rastogi  CSE, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Dan Suciu  CSE, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 90,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1376916.1376934
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Key Violations often occur in real-life datasets, especially in those integrated from different sources. Enforcing constraints strictly on these datasets is not feasible. In this paper we formalize the notion of soft-key constraints on probabilistic databases, which allow for violation of key constraint by penalizing every violating world by a quantity proportional to the violation. To represent our probabilistic database with constraints, we define a class of markov networks, where we can do query evaluation in PTIME. We also study the evaluation of conjunctive queries on relations with soft keys and present a dichotomy that separates this set into those in PTIME and the rest which are #P-Hard.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
L. Antova, C. Koch, and D. Olteanu. MayBMS: Managing incomplete information with probabilistic world-set decompositions. In ICDE, 2007.
 
3
 
4
 
5
O. Benjelloun, A. D. Sarma, C. Hayworth, and J. Widom. An introduction to ULDBs and the Trio system. IEEE Data Eng. Bull, 29(1):5--16, 2006.
 
6
 
7
8
9
 
10
11
12
13
 
14
L. Getoor. An introduction to probabilistic graphical models for relational data. Data Engineering Bulletin, 29(1), march 2006.
15
16
 
17
 
18
H. Poon and P. Domingos. Joint inference in information extraction. In AAAI, pages 913--918, 2007.
 
19
C. Re, N. Dalvi, and D. Suciu. Efficient Top-k query evaluation on probabilistic data. In ICDE, 2007.
 
20
C. Re, N. N. Dalvi, and D. Suciu. Query evaluation on probabilistic databases. IEEE Data Eng. Bull, 2006.
 
21
C. Re and D.Suciu. Efficient evaluation of having queries on a probabilistic database. In Proceedings of DBPL, 2007.
 
22
 
23
 
24
P. Sen and A. Deshpande. Representing and querying correlated tuples in probabilistic databases. In ICDE. IEEE, 2007.
 
25
W. Shen, X. Li, and A. Doan. Constraint-based entity matching. In AAAI, pages 862--867, 2005.
 
26
 
27
S. Staworko, J. Chomicki, and J. Marcinkowski. Preference-driven querying of inconsistent relational databases. In EDBT Workshops, pages 318--335, 2006.
 
28
L. G. Valiant. The complexity of enumeration and reliability problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 8(3):410--421, 1979.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Abhay Jha: colleagues
Vibhor Rastogi: colleagues
Dan Suciu: colleagues