ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Removing the need for state dissemination in grid resource brokering
Full text PdfPdf (223 KB)
Source Middleware Conference archive
Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Middleware for grid computing: held at the ACM/IFIP/USENIX 8th International Middleware Conference table of contents
Newport Beach, California
Article No. 9  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-944-9
Author
Peer Hasselmeyer  NEC Laboratories Europe, Sankt Augustin, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1376849.1376858
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Resource brokering in Grids is nowadays handled by resource brokers that require detailed knowledge of the state of the resources that they broker. In business settings, surrendering internal information on resources to an outside party is not an option. The traditional resource brokering method based on intimate resource knowledge is therefore not a viable possibility.

This paper argues that the publication of resource state data is not needed for resource brokering. Instead, we advocate the use of service level agreements (SLAs). The use of SLAs for brokering lets providers keep state information internal and at the same time provides customers with guarantees on the used services.

The proposed model has been implemented in the form of a resource broker that is based on Web Service technology. It shows that the approach of using SLAs for scheduling is a possible solution to keeping resource state private.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Amazon.com. Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), 2007. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2.
 
2
 
3
Catalin L. Dumitrescu and Ian Foster. GRUBER: A Grid Resource Usage SLA Broker. In: Euro-Par 2005 Parallel Processing. Springer Verlag, 2005.
 
4
 
5
Erik Elmroth and Johan Tordsson. A Grid Resource Broker Supporting Advance Reservations and Benchmark-based Resource Selection. In: Applied Parallel Computing -- State of the Art in Scientific Computing. Springer Verlag, 2006.
 
6
Ian Foster, Carl Kesselman, Craig Lee, Bob Lindell, Klara Nahrstedt, and Alain Roy. A Distributed Resource Management Architecture that Supports Advance Reservations and Co-Allocation. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS '99), London, England, June 1999.
 
7
G. Avellino et al. The EU DataGrid Workload Management System: towards the second major release. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2003), San Diego, CA, March 2003.
 
8
Kamel Haddadou, Samir Ghamri-Doudane, Yacine Ghamri-Doudane, and Nazim Agoulmine. Designing Scalable On-Demand Policy-Based Resource Allocation in IP Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 44(3):142--149, March 2006.
 
9
Peer Hasselmeyer, Changtao Qu, Lutz Schubert, Bastian Koller, and Philipp Wieder. Towards Autonomous Brokered SLA Negotiation. In: Proceedings of the eChallenges e-2006 Conference, Barcelona, Spain, October 2006.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
NextGRID Consortium. NextGRID Homepage. http://www.nextgrid.org/.
 
14
Open Grid Forum. Web Services Agreement Specification (WS-Agreement), March 2007. http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.107.pdf.
 
15
Todd Tannenbaum, Derek Wright, Karen Miller, and Miron Livny. Condor: a distributed job scheduler. MIT Press, 2001.