ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Preservation of proximity privacy in publishing numerical sensitive data
Full text PdfPdf (309 KB)
Source
International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents
Vancouver, Canada
SESSION: Research Session 11: Privacy and Testing table of contents
Pages 473-486  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-102-6
Authors
Jiexing Li  Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Yufei Tao  Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Xiaokui Xiao  Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 246,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1376616.1376666
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We identify proximity breach as a privacy threat specific to numerical sensitive attributes in anonymized data publication. Such breach occurs when an adversary concludes with high confidence that the sensitive value of a victim individual must fall in a short interval --- even though the adversary may have low confidence about the victim's actual value.

None of the existing anonymization principles (e.g., k-anonymity, l-diversity, etc.) can effectively prevent proximity breach. We remedy the problem by introducing a novel principle called (ε, m)-anonymity. Intuitively, the principle demands that, given a QI-group G, for every sensitive value x in G, at most 1/m of the tuples in G can have sensitive values "similar" to x, where the similarity is controlled by ε. We provide a careful analytical study of the theoretical characteristics of (ε, m)-anonymity, and the corresponding generalization algorithm. Our findings are verified by experiments with real data.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. C. Aggarwal and P. S. Yu. A condensation approach to privacy preserving data mining. In Proc. of Extending Database Technology (EDBT), pages 183--199, 2004.
2
 
3
G. Aggarwal, T. Feder, K. Kenthapadi, R. Motwani, R. Panigrahy, D. Thomas, and A. Zhu. Anonymizing tables. In Proc. of International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT), pages 246--258, 2005.
 
4
5
6
 
7
8
9
10
 
11
J.-W. Byun, Y. Sohn, E. Bertino, and N. Li. Secure anonymization for incremental datasets. In Secure Data Management (SDM), pages 48--63, 2006.
 
12
 
13
Y. Du, T. Xia, Y. Tao, D. Zhang, and F. Zhu. On multidimensional k-anonymity with local recoding generalization. In Proc. of International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 1422--1424, 2007.
 
14
C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In Theory of Cryptography Conference (TCC), pages 265--284, 2006.
15
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
20
 
21
22
23
24
 
25
 
26
N. Li, T. Li, and S. Venkatasubramanian. t-closeness: Privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity. In Proc. of International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 106--115, 2007.
 
27
 
28
D. Martin, D. Kifer, A. Machanavajjhala, J. Gehrke, and J. Halpern. Worst-case background knowledge in privacy. In Proc. of International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), 2007.
29
 
30
31
32
 
33
34
 
35
 
36
37
38
 
39
40
 
41
42
43
 
44
Q. Zhang, N. Koudas, D. Srivastava, and T. Yu. Aggregate query answering on anonymized tables. In Proc. of International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 116--125, 2007.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jiexing Li: colleagues
Yufei Tao: colleagues
Xiaokui Xiao: colleagues