ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
ARCube: supporting ranking aggregate queries in partially materialized data cubes
Full text PdfPdf (412 KB)
Source
International Conference on Management of Data archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data table of contents
Vancouver, Canada
SESSION: Research Session 2: Ranking table of contents
Pages 79-92  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-102-6
Authors
Tianyi Wu  University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
Dong Xin  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Jiawei Han  University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 193,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1376616.1376627
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Supporting ranking queries in database systems has been a popular research topic recently. However, there is a lack of study on supporting ranking queries in data warehouses where ranking is on multidimensional aggregates instead of on measures of base facts. To address this problem, we propose a query execution model to answer different types of ranking aggregate queries based on a unified, partial cube structure, ARCube. The query execution model follows a candidate generation and verification framework, where the most promising candidate cells are generated using a set of high-level guiding cells. We also identify a bounding principle for effective pruning: once a guiding cell is pruned, all of its children candidate cells can be pruned. We further address the problem of efficient online candidate aggregation and verification by developing a chunk-based execution model to verify a bulk of candidates within a bounded memory buffer. Our extensive performance study shows that the new framework not only leads to an order of magnitude performance improvements over the state-of-the-art method, but also is much more flexible in terms of the types of ranking aggregate queries supported.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
DBLP. http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/.
 
2
TPC-H. http://www.tpc.org/tpch/.
3
 
4
5
 
6
7
8
9
10
 
11
 
12
13
14
 
15
16
 
17
18
19
 
20
21
 
22
23
24
 
25
H.-G. Li, H. Yu, D. Agrawal, and A. E. Abbadi. Progressive ranking of range aggregates. In DaWaK, pages 179--189, 2005.
 
26
27
 
28
 
29
30
 
31
 
32
 
33
34

Collaborative Colleagues:
Tianyi Wu: colleagues
Dong Xin: colleagues
Jiawei Han: colleagues