| Capacity constrained assignment in spatial databases |
| Full text |
Pdf
(1.34 MB)
|
Source
|
International Conference on Management of Data
archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
table of contents
Vancouver, Canada
SESSION: Research Session 1: Tracking Data in Space
table of contents
Pages 15-28
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-102-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16, Downloads (12 Months): 331, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Given a point set P of customers (e.g., WiFi receivers) and a point set Q of service providers (e.g., wireless access points), where each q ∈ Q has a capacity q.k, the capacity constrained assignment (CCA) is a matching M ⊆ Q × P such that (i) each point q ∈ Q (p ∈ P) appears at most k times (at most once) in M, (ii) the size of M is maximized (i.e., it comprises min{|P|, ∑q∈Qq.k} pairs), and (iii) the total assignment cost (i.e., the sum of Euclidean distances within all pairs) is minimized. Thus, the CCA problem is to identify the assignment with the optimal overall quality; intuitively, the quality of q's service to p in a given (q, p) pair is anti-proportional to their distance. Although max-flow algorithms are applicable to this problem, they require the complete distance-based bipartite graph between Q and P. For large spatial datasets, this graph is expensive to compute and it may be too large to fit in main memory. Motivated by this fact, we propose efficient algorithms for optimal assignment that employ novel edge-pruning strategies, based on the spatial properties of the problem. Additionally, we develop approximate (i.e., suboptimal) CCA solutions that provide a trade-off between result accuracy and computation cost, abiding by theoretical quality guarantees. A thorough experimental evaluation demonstrates the efficiency and practicality of the proposed techniques.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Ravindra K. Ahuja , Thomas L. Magnanti , James B. Orlin, Network flows: theory, algorithms, and applications, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1993
|
 |
2
|
Norbert Beckmann , Hans-Peter Kriegel , Ralf Schneider , Bernhard Seeger, The R*-tree: an efficient and robust access method for points and rectangles, Proceedings of the 1990 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.322-331, May 23-26, 1990, Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States
|
| |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
Antonio Corral , Yannis Manolopoulos , Yannis Theodoridis , Michael Vassilakopoulos, Closest pair queries in spatial databases, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.189-200, May 15-18, 2000, Dallas, Texas, United States
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
J. Munkres. Algorithms for the Assignment and Transportation Problems. Journal of the Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 5(1):32--38, 1957.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
L. H. U, N. Mamoulis, and M. L. Yiu. Continuous Monitoring of Exclusive Closest Pairs. In SSTD, 2007.
|
| |
13
|
J. Vygen. Approximation Algorithms for Facility Location Problems (Lecture Notes). University of Bonn, 2004.
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
|