ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Making place for clutter and other ideas of home
Full text PdfPdf (846 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) archive
Volume 15 ,  Issue 2  (July 2008) table of contents
Article No. 9  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1073-0516
Authors
Laurel Swan  Brunel University, Microsoft Research, Middlesex, United Kingdom
Alex S. Taylor  Brunel University, Microsoft Research, Middlesex, United Kingdom
Richard Harper  Brunel University, Microsoft Research, Middlesex, United Kingdom
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 48,   Downloads (12 Months): 420,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1375761.1375764
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this article, we examine the containment of clutter in family homes and, from this, outline considerations for design. Selected materials from an ethnographically informed study of home life are used to detail the ways in which families contain their clutter in bowls and drawers. Clutter, within these containers, is found to be made up of a heterogeneous collection of things that, for all manner of reasons, hold an ambiguous status in the home. It is shown that bowls and drawers provide a “safe” site of containment for clutter, giving the miscellany of content the “space” to be properly dealt with and classified, or to be left unresolved. The shared but idiosyncratic practices families use to contain their clutter are seen to be one of the ways in which the home, or at least the idea of home, is collectively produced. It is also part of the means by which families come to make their homes distinct and unique. These findings are used to consider what it might mean to design for the home, and to do so in ways that are sensitive to the idiosyncratic systems of household organization. In conclusion, thought is given to how we design for people's ideas of home, and how we might build sites of uncertainty into homes, where physical as well as digital things might coalesce.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, B. 1997. Work, ethnography and system design. In The Encyclopaedia of Microcomputers, A. Kent and J. G. Williams, Eds. Marcel Dekker, New York, 159--183.
 
2
Anderson, R. and Sharrock, W. 1992. Can organisations afford knowledge? Comput. Supp. Coop. Work, 1, 3, 143--161.
 
3
Berg, A.-J. 1999. A gendered socio-technical construction: The smart house. In The Social Shaping of Technology, D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman, Eds. Open University Press, Buckingham, 301--313.
 
4
 
5
6
7
 
8
Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., and Rodden, T. 2002. Coordinate displays in the home. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW'02), Workshop on Public, Community and Situated Displays. ACM Press.
 
9
10
 
11
Daniels, I. Japanese material culture and consumerism: A review of recent work. 1999. J. Mat. Cul. 4, 2, 231--240.
 
12
Douglas, M. 2002. Purity and Danger. Routledge, London, UK.
 
13
Douglas, M. 1991. The idea of a home: A kind of space. Soc. Resear, 58, 1, 287--307.
14
15
16
 
17
Durkheim, E. 2001. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
 
18
 
19
20
 
21
 
22
Harper, R., Evergeti, V., Hamill, L., and Strain, J. 2000. Paper-mail in the home of the 21st Century. Tech. rep. Digital World Research Centre, University of Surrey.
23
24
25
 
26
Martin, B. Mother wouldn't like It!: Housework as magic. 1984. Theory, Culture Soc. 2, 19--35.
 
27
Mungiatapia, E., Intille, S. S., and Larson, K. 2004. Activity recognition in the home setting using simple and ubiquitious sensors. Proceedings of the Coneference on Pervasive Computing. Springer-Verlag, 158--175.
28
 
29
Norman, D. A. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, NY.
30
 
31
32
 
33
Smith, P. 1999. The elementary forms of place and their transformations: A Durkheimian Model. Qual. Sociol., 22, 13--36.
 
34
 
35
Suchman, L. 1994. Working relations of technology production and use. J. Comput.-Supp. Coop. Work 2, 21--39.
 
36
Taylor, A. S. and Harper, R. 2003. Switching On to Switch Off. In Inside the Smart Home, Harper, R. Ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 115--126.
37
38
 
39
Turner, V. 1977. Variations on a theme of liminality. In Secular Ritual Moore, S. and Meyerhoff, B. Eds. Van Gorcum, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 48.
 
40
van Gennep, A. 1960. The Rites of Passage. Routledge, London, UK.
 
41
Zerubavel, E. 1992. Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. University of California Press.


REVIEW

"William Edward Mihalo : Reviewer"

Swan, Taylor, and Harper discuss the way families classify objects, with a particular focus on clutter. They note that clutter is difficult to define:

We have come to think of clutter as something that is understood in relation to othe  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Laurel Swan: colleagues
Alex S. Taylor: colleagues
Richard Harper: colleagues