ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The effects of co-present embodiments on awareness and collaboration in tabletop groupware
Full text MovMov (3:18),  PdfPdf (909 KB)
Source
GI; Vol. 322 archive
Proceedings of graphics interface 2008 table of contents
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
SESSION: Large displays table of contents
Pages 1-8  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN ~ ISSN:0713-5424 , 978-1-56881-423-0
Authors
David Pinelle  University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Miguel Nacenta  University of Saskatchewan
Carl Gutwin  University of Saskatchewan
Tadeusz Stach  Queen's University
Sponsor
: The Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society / Société Canadienne du Dialogue Humaine Machine (CHCCS/SCDHM)
Publisher
Canadian Information Processing Society  Toronto, Ont., Canada, Canada
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 189,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Most current tabletop groupware systems use direct touch, where people manipulate objects by touching them with a pen or a fingertip. The use of people's real arms and hands provides obvious awareness information, but workspace access is limited by the user's reach. Relative input techniques, where users manipulate a cursor rather than touching objects directly, allow users to reach all areas of the table. However, the only available awareness information comes from the virtual embodiment of the user (e.g., their cursor). This presents designers with a tradeoff: direct-touch techniques have advantages for group awareness; relative input techniques offer additional power but less awareness information. In this paper, we explore this tradeoff, and we explore the design space of virtual embodiments to determine whether factors such as size, realism, and visibility can improve awareness and coordination. We conducted a study in which seven groups carried out a picture-categorizing task using seven techniques: direct touch and relative input with six different virtual embodiments. Our results provide both valuable information to designers of tabletop groupware, and a number of new directions for future research.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
4
 
5
Endsley, M. R. Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37, 1 (1995), 65--84.
 
6
Endsley, M. R., Kiris, E. O. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT) TRACON air traffic control version user guide. Tech. report TTUIE-95-02, Industrial Eng., Texas Tech, 1995.
7
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
Hascoët, M., Throwing Models for Large Displays. Proc. HCI 2003, British HCI Group, 73--77.
13
 
14
Microsoft Surface Computing. http://www.surface.com
15
16
17
 
18
O'Brien, R. G. A General ANOVA Method for Robust Tests of Additive Models for Variances, Journal of the American Statistical Assoc., 74(368), 1979, 877--880.
 
19
 
20
Pauchet, A., Coldefy, F., Lefebvre, L., Louis dit Picard, S., Perron, L., Guérin, J. TableTops: worthwhile experience of collocated and remote collaboration. Proceedings of Tabletop 2007.
 
21
Pinelle, D., Dyck, J., Gutwin, C., Stach, T. (2006) Cutouts: Multiple Views for Tabletop Groupware, Tech Report HCI-TR-06-04.
 
22
Ramsey, P. H. Testing Variances in Psychological and Educational Research, Journal of Educational Statistics 19(1), 1994, 23--42.
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
29
Tang, A., Neustaedter, C., Greenberg, S., VideoArms: Embodiments for Mixed Presence Groupware. Proc HCI 2006, 85--102.
30


Collaborative Colleagues:
David Pinelle: colleagues
Miguel Nacenta: colleagues
Carl Gutwin: colleagues
Tadeusz Stach: colleagues