ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Delegation forwarding
Full text PdfPdf (270 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 9th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing table of contents
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
SESSION: Mobile ad hoc networks table of contents
Pages 251-260  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-073-9
Authors
Vijay Erramilli  Boston University, Boston, USA
Mark Crovella  Boston University, Boston, USA
Augustin Chaintreau  Thomson Paris, Paris, France
Christophe Diot  Thomson Paris, Paris, France
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 232,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1374618.1374653
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Mobile opportunistic networks are characterized by unpredictable mobility, heterogeneity of contact rates and lack of global information. Successful delivery of messages at low costs and delays in such networks is thus challenging. Most forwarding algorithms avoid the cost associated with flooding the network by forwarding only to nodes that are likely to be good relays, using a quality metric associated with nodes. However it is non-trivial to decide whether an encountered node is a good relay at the moment of encounter. Thus the problem is in part one of online inference of the quality distribution of nodes from sequential samples, and has connections to optimal stopping theory. Based on these observations we develop a new strategy for forwarding, which we refer to as delegation forwarding.

We analyse two variants of delegation forwarding and show that while naive forwarding to high contact rate nodes has cost linear in the population size, the cost of delegation forwarding is proportional to the square root of population size. We then study delegation forwarding with different metrics using real mobility traces and show that delegation forwarding performs as well as previously proposed algorithms at much lower cost. In particular we show that the delegation scheme based on destination contact rate does particularly well.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
 
4
Burgess, J., Gallagher, B., Jensen, D., and Levine, B. N. MaxProp: Routing for Vehicle-Based Disruption-Tolerant Networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (April 2006).
5
 
6
Chaintreau, A., Hui, P., Crowcroft, J., Diot, C., Gass, R., and Scott, J. Pocket Switched Networks: Real-world mobility and its consequences for Opportunistic Forwarding. Tech. Rep. UCAM-CL-TR-617, University of Cambridge, 2005.
 
7
8
9
 
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
 
20
Sarafijanovic-Djukic, N., Pidrkowski, M., and Grossglauser, M. Island hopping: Efficient mobility assisted forwarding in partitioned networks. In IEEE SECON '06.
 
21
Shiryaev, A. N. Optimal Stopping Rules. Springer, 2008.
 
22
 
23
Vahdat, A., and Becker, D. Epidemic Routing for Partially Connected Ad Hoc Networks. Tech. Rep. CS-200006, Duke University, 2000.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Vijay Erramilli: colleagues
Mark Crovella: colleagues
Augustin Chaintreau: colleagues
Christophe Diot: colleagues