| DW-MAC: a low latency, energy efficient demand-wakeup MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks |
| Full text |
Pdf
(518 KB)
|
Source
|
International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing
archive
Proceedings of the 9th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing
table of contents
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
SESSION: Link layer design and rescheduling
table of contents
Pages 53-62
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-073-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
Yanjun Sun
|
Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
|
|
Shu Du
|
Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
|
|
Omer Gurewitz
|
Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
|
|
David B. Johnson
|
Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 34, Downloads (12 Months): 403, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Duty cycling is a widely used mechanism in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) to reduce energy consumption due to idle listening, but this mechanism also introduces additional latency in packet delivery. Several schemes have been proposed to mitigate this latency, but they are mainly optimized for light traffic loads. A WSN, however, could often experience bursty and high traffic loads, such as due to broadcast or convergecast traffic. In this paper, we present a new MAC protocol, called Demand Wakeup MAC (DW-MAC), that introduces a new low-overhead scheduling algorithm that allows nodes to wake up on demand during the Sleep period of an operational cycle and ensures that data transmissions do not collide at their intended receivers. This demand wakeup adaptively increases effective channel capacity during an operational cycle as traffic load increases, allowing DW-MAC to achieve low delivery latency under a wide range of traffic loads including both unicast and broadcast traffic. We compare DW-MAC with S-MAC (with and without adaptive listening) and with RMAC using ns-2 and show that DW-MAC outperforms these protocols, with increasing benefits as traffic load increases. For example, under high unicast traffic load, DW-MAC reduces delivery latency by 70% compared to S-MAC and RMAC, and uses only 50% of the energy consumed with S-MAC with adaptive listening. Under broadcast traffic, DW-MAC reduces latency by more than 50% on average while maintaining higher energy efficiency.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
G. Anastasi , A. Falchi , A. Passarella , M. Conti , E. Gregori, Performance measurements of motes sensor networks, Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, October 04-06, 2004, Venice, Italy
[doi> 10.1145/1023663.1023695]
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Chipcon. Single Chip Very Low Power RF Transceiver (CC1000 Datasheet), April 2002.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Shu Du, Amit Kumar Saha, and David B. Johnson. RMAC: A Routing-Enhanced Duty-Cycle MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM 2007), pages 1478--1486, May 2007.
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
Deborah Estrin , Ramesh Govindan , John Heidemann , Satish Kumar, Next century challenges: scalable coordination in sensor networks, Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.263-270, August 15-19, 1999, Seattle, Washington, United States
[doi> 10.1145/313451.313556]
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Philip Levis. TEP 111: message_t. TinyOS 2.0 Documentation, http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/.
|
| |
14
|
Yuan Li, Wei Ye, and John Heidemann. Energy and Latency Control in Low Duty Cycle MAC Protocols. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC 2005), March 2005.
|
| |
15
|
Gang Lu, Bhaskar Krishnamachari, and Cauligi S. Raghavendra. An Adaptive Energy-Efficient and Low-Latency MAC for Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2004), April 2004.
|
| |
16
|
Gang Lu, Narayanan Sadagopan, Bhaskar Krishnamachari, and Ashish Goel. Delay Efficient Sleep Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2005), pages 2470--2481, March 2005.
|
| |
17
|
David Moss, Jonathan Hui, Philip Levis, and Jung Il Choi. TEP 126: CC2420 Radio Stack. http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/, 2007.
|
 |
18
|
Sze-Yao Ni , Yu-Chee Tseng , Yuh-Shyan Chen , Jang-Ping Sheu, The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad hoc network, Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.151-162, August 15-19, 1999, Seattle, Washington, United States
[doi> 10.1145/313451.313525]
|
 |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
|
 |
23
|
Victor Shnayder , Mark Hempstead , Bor-rong Chen , Geoff Werner Allen , Matt Welsh, Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1031495.1031518]
|
 |
24
|
Fred Stann , John Heidemann , Rajesh Shroff , Muhammad Zaki Murtaza, RBP: robust broadcast propagation in wireless networks, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, October 31-November 03, 2006, Boulder, Colorado, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1182807.1182817]
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
Wei Ye, John S. Heidemann, and Deborah Estrin. An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2002), pages 1567--1576, June 2002.
|
 |
28
|
|
 |
29
|
Hongwei Zhang , Anish Arora , Young-ri Choi , Mohamed G. Gouda, Reliable bursty convergecast in wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing, May 25-27, 2005, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1062689.1062724]
|
|