ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Communication in the presence of replication
Full text PdfPdf (249 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: 15A table of contents
Pages 661-670  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-047-0
Authors
Omer Barkol  Technion, Haifa, Israel
Yuval Ishai  Technion, Haifa, Israel
Enav Weinreb  CWI, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 103,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1374376.1374472
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider the following problem. Suppose that a big amount of data is distributed among several parties, so that each party misses only few pieces of data. The parties wish to perform some global computation on the data while minimizing the communication between them. This situation is common in many real-life scenarios. A naive solution to this problem is to first perform a synchronization step, letting one party learn all pieces of data, and then let this party perform the required computation locally. We study the question of obtaining better solutions to the problem, focusing mainly on the case of computing low-degree polynomials via non-interactive protocols. We present interesting connections between this problem and the well studied cryptographic problem of secret sharing. We use this connection to obtain nontrivial upper bounds and lower bounds using results and techniques from the domain of secret sharing. The relation with open problems from the area of secret sharing also provides evidence for the difficulty of resolving some of the questions we leave open.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
O. Barkol and Y. Ishai. Secure computation of constant-depth circuits with applications to database search problems. In Proc. of Crypto 2005, pages 395--411.
 
3
A. Beimel. Secure schemes for secret sharing and key distribution. PhD thesis, Technion, 1996.
 
4
 
5
G.R. Blakley. Safeguarding cryptographic keys. In Proc. of the American Federation of Information Processing Societies (AFIPS), volume 48, pages 313--317, 1979.
 
6
C. Blundo, A. De Santis, D. R. Stinson, and U. Vaccaro. Graph decompositions and secret sharing schemes. J. Cryptology, 8(1):39--64, 1995.
7
 
8
R. Cramer, I. Damgå rd, and Y. Ishai. Share conversion, pseudorandom secret-sharing and applications to secure computation. In Proc. 2nd TCC, pages 342--362, 2005.
 
9
L. Csirmaz. Secret sharing schemes on graphs. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/246719.html.
 
10
 
11
 
12
P. Harsha, Y. Ishai, J. Kilian, K. Nissim, and S. Venkatesh. Communication versus computation. In Proc. 31st ICALP, pages 745--756, 2004.
 
13
J. Hastad and M. Goldmann. On the power of small-depth threshold circuits. Computational Complexity, 1(2):113--129, 1991.
 
14
M. Karchmer and A. Wigderson. On span programs. In Proc. 8th CCC, pages 102--1111, 1993.
 
15
J. Kilian and N. Nisan. Private communication, 1990.
 
16
 
17
18
 
19
P. Pudlák and J. Sgall. Algebraic models of computation and interpolation for algebraic proof systems. DIMACS Ser. in Disc. Math. and Th. Comp. Sci., 39:279--295, 1998.
 
20
A. Razborov. Lower bounds for the size of circuits of bounded depth with basis (AND, XOR). Math. Notes of the Academy of Sci. of USSR, 41(4):333--338, 1987.
 
21
22
 
23
D. Slepian and J. Wolf. Noiseless coding of correlated information sources. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 19(4):471--480, 1973.
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Omer Barkol: colleagues
Yuval Ishai: colleagues
Enav Weinreb: colleagues