ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On agnostic boosting and parity learning
Full text PdfPdf (299 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: 13B table of contents
Pages 629-638  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-047-0
Authors
Adam Tauman Kalai  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Yishay Mansour  Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Elad Verbin  Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 77,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1374376.1374466
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The motivating problem is agnostically learning parity functions, i.e., parity with arbitrary or adversarial noise. Specifically, given random labeled examples from an *arbitrary* distribution, we would like to produce an hypothesis whose accuracy nearly matches the accuracy of the best parity function. Our algorithm runs in time 2O(n/log n), which matches the best known for the easier cases of learning parities with random classification noise (Blum et al, 2003) and for agnostically learning parities over the uniform distribution on inputs (Feldman et al, 2006).

Our approach is as follows. We give an agnostic boosting theorem that is capable of nearly achieving optimal accuracy, improving upon earlier studies (starting with Ben David et al, 2001). To achieve this, we circumvent previous lower bounds by altering the boosting model. We then show that the (random noise) parity learning algorithm of Blum et al (2000) fits our new model of agnostic weak learner. Our agnostic boosting framework is completely general and may be applied to other agnostic learning problems. Hence, it also sheds light on the actual difficulty of agnostic learning by showing that full agnostic boosting is indeed possible.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Ari Juels and Stephen A. Weis. Authenticating pervasive devices with human protocols. In CRYPTO, pages 293--308, 2005.
 
11
 
12
13
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Vadim Lyubashevsky. The parity problem in the presence of noise, decoding random linear codes, and the subset sum problem. In APPROX--RANDOM, pages 378--389, 2005.
 
18
Y. Mansour and D. McAllester. Boosting using branching programs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 64(1):103--112, 2002.
19
20
 
21
22


Collaborative Colleagues:
Adam Tauman Kalai: colleagues
Yishay Mansour: colleagues
Elad Verbin: colleagues