| A learning theory approach to non-interactive database privacy |
| Full text |
Pdf
(229 KB)
|
Source
|
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
archive
Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
table of contents
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Pages 609-618
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-047-0
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18, Downloads (12 Months): 147, Citation Count: 6
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We demonstrate that, ignoring computational constraints, it is possible to release privacy-preserving databases that are useful for all queries over a discretized domain from any given concept class with polynomial VC-dimension. We show a new lower bound for releasing databases that are useful for halfspace queries over a continuous domain. Despite this, we give a privacy-preserving polynomial time algorithm that releases information useful for all halfspace queries, for a slightly relaxed definition of usefulness. Inspired by learning theory, we introduce a new notion of data privacy, which we call distributional privacy, and show that it is strictly stronger than the prevailing privacy notion, differential privacy.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
Boaz Barak , Kamalika Chaudhuri , Cynthia Dwork , Satyen Kale , Frank McSherry , Kunal Talwar, Privacy, accuracy, and consistency too: a holistic solution to contingency table release, Proceedings of the twenty-sixth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, June 11-13, 2007, Beijing, China
[doi> 10.1145/1265530.1265569]
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
S. Dasgupta and A. Gupta. An elementary proof of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma. International Computer Science Institute, Technical Report, pages 99--006, 1999.
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
C. Dwork. Differential privacy. Proc. ICALP, 2006.
|
| |
8
|
C. Dwork, K. Kenthapadi, F. McSherry, I. Mironov, and M. Naor. Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy via Distributed Noise Generation. Proceedings of Advances in CryptologyEurocrypt 2006, pages 486--503, 2006.
|
| |
9
|
C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. Proceedings of the 3rd Theory of Cryptography Conference, pages 265--284, 2006.
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
C. Dwork and K. Nissim. Privacy-preserving datamining on vertically partitioned databases. Proc. CRYPTO, pages 528--544, 2004.
|
 |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
Shiva Kasiviswanathan, Homin K. Lee, Kobbi Nissim, Sofya Raskhodnikova, and Adam Smith. What can we learn privately? http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0924v1.
|
| |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
A. J. Smola and B. Scholkopf. Learning with Kernels. MIT Press, 2002.
|
| |
19
|
|
CITED BY 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Feldman , Amos Fiat , Haim Kaplan , Kobbi Nissim, Private coresets, Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, May 31-June 02, 2009, Bethesda, MD, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cynthia Dwork , Moni Naor , Omer Reingold , Guy N. Rothblum , Salil Vadhan, On the complexity of differentially private data release: efficient algorithms and hardness results, Proceedings of the 41st annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, May 31-June 02, 2009, Bethesda, MD, USA
|
|