ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Inverse conjecture for the gowers norm is false
Full text PdfPdf (322 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: 11B table of contents
Pages 547-556  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-047-0
Authors
Shachar Lovett  The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Roy Meshulam  The Technion, Haifa, Israel
Alex Samorodnitsky  The Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 61,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1374376.1374454
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Let p be a fixed prime number and N be a large integer. The "Inverse Conjecture for the Gowers Norm" states that if the "d-th Gowers norm" of a function f:FNp to Fp is non-negligible, that is larger than a constant independent of N, then f has a non-trivial correlation with a degree d-1 polynomial. The conjecture is known to hold for d=2,3 and for any prime p. In this paper we show the conjecture to be false for p=2 and for d=4, by presenting an explicit function whose 4-th Gowers norm is non-negligible, but whose correlation with any polynomial of degree 3 is exponentially small. Essentially the same result, with different bounds for correlation, was independently obtained by Green and Tao. Their analysis uses a modification of a Ramsey-type argument of Alon and Beigel to show inapproximability of certain functions by low-degree polynomials. We observe that a combination of our results with the argument of Alon and Beigel implies the inverse conjecture to be false for any prime p, for d = p2.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
N. Alon, T. Kaufman, M. Krivelevich, S. Litsyn, D. Ron, Testing low--degree polynomials over GF(2), RANDOM--APPROX 2003,pp. 188--199.
 
3
M. Bellare, D. Coppersmith, J. Hastad, M. Kiwi, M. Sudan Linearity testing in characteristic 2, IEEE Trans. Inform.Theory, vol. IT-42, 6, 1996, 1782--1795.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
W. T. Gowers, A new proof of Szemeredi's theorem, GAFA Vol.11(2001), pp. 465--588.
 
8
B. Green, T. Tao, An inverse theorem for the Gowers U3norm, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc., to appear.
 
9
B. Green, T.Tao, The distribution of polynomials over finitefields, with applications to the Gowers norms, preprint, 2007.
 
10
B. Host, B. Kra, Nonconventional ergodic averages andnilmanifolds, Annals of Math. 161, 1 (2005) 397--488.
 
11
 
12
. MacWilliams and N. J. A. Sloane, TheTheory of Error Correcting Codes, Amsterdam, North--Holland, 1977.
13
 
14
 
15


Collaborative Colleagues:
Shachar Lovett: colleagues
Roy Meshulam: colleagues
Alex Samorodnitsky: colleagues