ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Games for exchanging information
Full text PdfPdf (298 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: 9B table of contents
Pages 423-432  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-047-0
Authors
Gillat Kol  Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Moni Naor  Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 177,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1374376.1374437
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider the rational versions of two of the classical problems in foundations of cryptography: secret sharing and multiparty computation, suggested by Halpern and Teague (STOC 2004). Our goal is to design games and fair strategies that encourage rational participants to exchange information about their inputs for their mutual benefit, when the only mean of communication is a broadcast channel.

We show that protocols for the above information exchanging tasks, where players' values come from a bounded domain, cannot satisfy some of the most desirable properties. In contrast, we provide a rational secret sharing scheme with simultaneous broadcast channel in which shares are taken from an unbounded domain, but have finite (and polynomial sized) expectation.

Previous schemes (mostly cryptographic) have required computational assumptions, making them inexact and susceptible to backward induction, or used stronger communication channels. Our scheme is non-cryptographic, immune to backward induction, and satisfies a stronger rationality concept (strict Nash equilibrium). We show that our solution can also be used to construct an ε-Nash equilibrium secret sharing scheme for the case of a non-simultaneous broadcast channel.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Garay and M. Jakobsson. Timed Releaseof Standard Digital Signatures, In Proceedings of FinancialCryptography, LNCS 2357, pages 168--182, Springer, 2002.
 
4
D. Gordon and J. Katz. Rational Secret Sharing,Revisited. Security and Cryptography for Networks (SCN),pages 229--241, 2006.
5
 
6
 
7
Kol and M. Naor. Cryptography and Game Theory:Designing Protocols for Exchanging Information. In theProceedings of the 5th Theory of Cryptography Conference (TCC),pages 317--336, 2008.
8
9
 
10
Lysyanskaya and N. Triandopoulos.Rationality and Adversarial Behavior in Multi--Party Computation.Advances in Cryptology -- CRYPTO 2006, pages 180--197, 2006.
 
11
Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course in GameTheory, MIT Press, 1994.
 
12
Pinkas. Fair Secure Two--Party Computation. Advancesin Cryptology -- Eurocrypt 2003, pages 87--105, 2003.
13
14
 
15
Wegman and L. Carter. New hash functionsand their use in authentication and set equality. Journal ofComputer and System Sciences, volume 22, pages 265--279, 1981.