ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Pricing combinatorial markets for tournaments
Full text PdfPdf (590 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: 7B table of contents
Pages 305-314  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-047-0
Authors
Yiling Chen  Yahoo! Research, New York, NY, USA
Sharad Goel  Yahoo! Research, New York, NY, USA
David M. Pennock  Yahoo! Research, New York, NY, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 91,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1374376.1374421
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In a prediction market, agents trade assets whose value is tied to a future event, for example the outcome of the next presidential election. Asset prices determine a probability distribution over the set of possible outcomes. Typically, the outcome space is small, allowing agents to directly trade in each outcome, and allowing a market maker to explicitly update asset prices. Combinatorial markets, in contrast, work to estimate a full joint distribution of dependent observations, in which case the outcome space grows exponentially. In this paper, we consider the problem of pricing combinatorial markets for single-elimination tournaments. With $n$ competing teams, the outcome space is of size 2n-1. We show that the general pricing problem for tournaments is P-hard. We derive a polynomial-time algorithm for a restricted betting language based on a Bayesian network representation of the probability distribution. The language is fairly natural in the context of tournaments, allowing for example bets of the form "team i wins game k". We believe that our betting language is the first for combinatorial market makers that is both useful and tractable. We briefly discuss a heuristic approximation technique for the general case.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. E. Berg, R. Forsythe, F. D. Nelson, and T. A. Rietz. Results from a dozen years of election futures markets research. In C. A. Plott and V. Smith, editors, Handbook of Experimental Economic Results (forthcoming). 2001.
 
2
Y. Chen, L. Fortnow, N. Lambert, D. M. Pennock, and J. Wortman. Complexity of combinatorial market makers. Unpublished manuscript, arXiv:0802.1362v1 {cs.GT}.
3
 
4
R. Forsythe, T. A. Rietz, and T. W. Ross. Wishes, expectations, and actions: A survey on price formation in election stock markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39:83--110, 1999.
 
5
 
6
C. Genest and C. G. Wagner. Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis. Aequationes Mathematicae, 32(1):74--86, 1987.
 
7
 
8
R. D. Hanson. Logarithmic market scoring rules for modular combinatorial information aggregation. Journal of Prediction Markets, 1(1):1--15, 2007.
 
9
A. Marshall. The use of multi-stage sampling schemes in monte carlo computations. In M. Meyer, editor, Symposium on Monte Carlo Methods, pages 123--140. Wiley, New York, 1956.
 
10
P. Milgrom and N. L. Stokey. Information, trade and common knowledge. Journal of Economic Theory, 26(1):17--27, 1982.
 
11
 
12
D. M. Pennock, S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, and F. A. Nielsen. The real power of artificial markets. Science, 291:987--988, February 2002.
 
13
 
14
C. R. Plott and S. Sunder. Efficiency of experimental security markets with insider information: An application of rational expectations models. Journal of Political Economy, 90:663--98, 1982.
 
15
C. R. Plott and S. Sunder. Rational expectations and the aggregation of diverse information in laboratory security markets. Econometrica, 56:1085--1118, 1988.
 
16
 
17
L. G. Valiant. The complexity of enumeration and reliability problems. SIAM J. Comput., 8(3):410--421, 1979.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Yiling Chen: colleagues
Sharad Goel: colleagues
David M. Pennock: colleagues