ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Combinatorial construction of locally testable codes
Full text PdfPdf (267 KB)
Source
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the 40th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: 7A table of contents
Pages 285-294  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-047-0
Author
Or Meir  Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 63,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1374376.1374419
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An error correcting code is said to be locally testable if there is a test that checks whether a given string is a codeword, or rather far from the code, by reading only a constant number of symbols of the string. Locally Testable Codes (LTCs) were first systematically studied by Goldreich and Sudan (J. ACM 53(4)) and since then several Constructions of LTCs have been suggested.

While the best known construction of LTCs by Ben-Sasson and Sudan (STOC 2005) and Dinur (J. ACM 54(3)) achieves very efficient parameters, it relies heavily on algebraic tools and on PCP machinery. In this work we present a new and arguably simpler construction of LTCs that is purely combinatorial, does not rely on PCP machinery and matches the parameters of the best known construction. However, unlike the latter construction, our construction is not entirely explicit.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
N. Alon, J. Bruck, J. Naor, M. Naor, and R. Roth, Construction of asymptotically good low rate error-correcting codes through pseudo--random graphs, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 38, 1992, pages 509--516.
2
3
 
4
 
5
E. Ben-Sasson and M. Sudan, Robust locally testable codes and products of codes, APPROX-RANDOM 2004, pages 286--297.
6
 
7
D. Coppersmith and A. Rudra, On the robust testability of tensor products of codes, ECCC TR05--104, 2005.
8
 
9
 
10
I. Dinur, M. Sudan and A. Wigderson, Robust local testability of tensor products of LDPC codes, APPROX-RANDOM 2006, pages 304--315.
 
11
L. Fortnow, J. Rompel and M. Sipser. On the power of multi--prover interactive protocols, In 3rd IEEE Symp. on Structure in Complexity Theory, 1988, pages 156--161. See errata in 5th IEEE Symp. on Structure in Complexity Theory, 1990, pages 318--319.
 
12
O. Goldreich, Short locally testable codes and proofs (Survey), ECCC TR05-014, 2005.
 
13
O. Goldreich and O. Meir, The tensor product of two good codes is not necessarily locally testable, ECCC TR07-062, 2007.
14
 
15
S. Hoory, N. Linial and A. Wigderson, Expander Graphs and their Applications, Bulletin of AMS, 43(4), 2006, pages 439--561.
 
16
 
17
O. Meir, Combinatorial construction of locally testable codes, ECCC TR07-115.
18
 
19
 
20
M. Sudan, Algorithmic introduction to coding theory, Lecture notes. Available from http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~madhu/FT01/, 2001.
 
21
P. Valiant, The tensor product of two codes is not necessarily robustly testable, APPROX-RANDOM 2005, pages 472--481.