ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Parametric Yield Modeling and Simulations of FPGA Circuits Considering Within-Die Delay Variations
Full text PdfPdf (570 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems (TRETS) archive
Volume 1 ,  Issue 2  (June 2008) table of contents
Article No. 10  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1936-7406
Authors
Pete Sedcole  Imperial College London
Peter Y. K. Cheung  Imperial College London
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 89,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1371579.1371582
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Variations in the semiconductor fabrication process results in differences in parameters between transistors on the same die, a problem exacerbated by lithographic scaling. Field-Programmable Gate Arrays may be able to compensate for within-die delay variability, by judicious use of reconfigurability. This article presents two strategies for compensating within-die stochastic delay variability by using reconfiguration: reconfiguring the entire FPGA, and relocating subcircuits within an FPGA. Analytical models for the theoretical bounds on the achievable gains are derived for both strategies and compared to models for worst-case design as well as statistical static timing analysis (SSTA). All models are validated by comparison to circuit-level Monte Carlo simulations. It is demonstrated that significant improvements in circuit yield and timing are possible using SSTA alone, and these improvements can be enhanced by employing reconfiguration-based techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Asenov, A., Kaya, S., and Brown, A. R. 2003. Intrinsic parameter fluctuations in decananometer MOSFETs introduced by gate line edge roughness. IEEE Trans. Electr. Devices 50, 5, 1254--1260.
 
3
Asenov, A., Kaya, S., and Davies, J. H. 2002. Intrinsic threshold voltage fluctuationsin decananometer MOSFETs due to local oxide thickness variations. IEEE Trans. Electr. Devices 49, 6, 112--119.
 
4
 
5
Cao, Y., Gupta, P., Kahng, A. B., Sylvester, D., and Yang, J. 2002. Design sensitivities to variability: Extrapolations and assessments in nanometer VLSI. In Proceedings of the IEEE International ASIC/SOC Conference.
 
6
Cattell, R. B. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav. Resear. 1, 245--276.
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Katsuki, K., Kotani, M., Kobayashi, K., and Onodera, H. 2005. A yield and speed enhancement scheme under within-die variations on 90nm LUT array. In Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference.
 
11
 
12
 
13
Kraśniewski, A. 2003. Evaluation of testability of path delay faults for user-configured programmable devices. In Proceedings of the Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. IEEE.
 
14
Li, X.-Y., Wang, F., La, T., and Ling, Z.-M. 2004. FPGA as process monitor--an effective method to characterize poly gate CD variation and its impact on product performance and yield. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 17, 3, 267--272.
 
15
Lin, Y., Hutton, M., and He, L. 2006. Placement and timing for FPGAs considering variations. In Proceedings of the Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. IEEE.
16
17
 
18
 
19
Sedcole, P., Blodget, B., Becker, T., Anderson, J., and Lysaght, P. 2006. Modular dynamic reconfiguration in Virtex FPGAs. IEE Proc. Comput. Digital Techniq. 153, 3, 157--164.
 
20
Sedcole, P. and Cheung, P. Y. K. 2006. Within-die delay variability in 90nm FPGAs and beyond. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Field Programmable Technology.
21
22
23
 
24
 
25
Zhao, W., Liu, F., Agarwal, K., Acharyya, D., Nassif, S., Nowka, K., and Cao, Y. 2007. Rigorous extraction of process variations for 65nm CMOS design. In Proceedings of the European Solid-State Circuits Conference.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Pete Sedcole: colleagues
Peter Y. K. Cheung: colleagues