AMIDA

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

AMIDA: a sequence diagram extraction toolkit supporting automatic phase detection

Full text

Pdf (290 KB)

Source

International Conference on Software Engineering archive
Companion of the 30th international conference on Software engineering table of contents

Leipzig, Germany

SESSION: Informal research demonstrations table of contents

Pages 969-970

Year of Publication: 2008

ISBN:978-1-60558-079-1

Authors

Takashi Ishio	Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Yui Watanabe	Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Katsuro Inoue	Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

Sponsors

ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a, Downloads (12 Months): n/a, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1370175.1370212 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Amida is a toolkit to record an execution trace of a Java program and visualize the trace as a sequence diagram. Amida supports our novel approach to efficiently detecting phases; the algorithm precisely divides a long execution trace into a series of smaller diagrams corresponding to features (or tasks to achieve a feature) without deep knowledge on a target system.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Bas Cornelissen , Danny Holten , Andy Zaidman , Leon Moonen , Jarke J. van Wijk , Arie van Deursen, Understanding Execution Traces Using Massive Sequence and Circular Bundle Views, Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, p.49-58, June 26-29, 2007 [doi>10.1109/ICPC.2007.39]
	2	Thomas Eisenbarth , Rainer Koschke , Daniel Simon, Locating Features in Source Code, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.29 n.3, p.210-224, March 2003 [doi>10.1109/TSE.2003.1183929]
	3	Abdelwahab Hamou-Lhadj , Timothy Lethbridge, Summarizing the Content of Large Traces to Facilitate the Understanding of the Behaviour of a Software System, Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, p.181-190, June 14-16, 2006 [doi>10.1109/ICPC.2006.45]
	4	Henry Lieberman , Carl Hewitt, A real-time garbage collector based on the lifetimes of objects, Communications of the ACM, v.26 n.6, p.419-429, June 1983 [doi>10.1145/358141.358147]
	5	Adrian Lienhard , Orla Greevy , Oscar Nierstrasz, Tracking Objects to Detect Feature Dependencies, Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, p.59-68, June 26-29, 2007 [doi>10.1109/ICPC.2007.38]
	6	Adrian Lienhard , Orla Greevy , Oscar Nierstrasz, Tracking Objects to Detect Feature Dependencies, Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, p.59-68, June 26-29, 2007 [doi>10.1109/ICPC.2007.38]
	7	Steven P. Reiss, Dynamic detection and visualization of software phases, Proceedings of the third international workshop on Dynamic analysis, p.1-6, May 17-17, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri
	8	Koji Taniguchi , Takashi Ishio , Toshihiro Kamiya , Shinji Kusumoto , Katsuro Inoue, Extracting Sequence Diagram from Execution Trace of Java Program, Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, p.148-154, September 05-06, 2005 [doi>10.1109/IWPSE.2005.19]