| Processing top k queries from samples |
| Full text |
Pdf
(516 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference On Emerging Networking Experiments And Technologies
archive
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM CoNEXT conference
table of contents
Lisboa, Portugal
SESSION: Supervision
table of contents
Article No. 7
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-456-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 22, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Top-k queries are desired aggregation operations on data sets. Examples of queries on network data include the top 100 source AS's, top 100 ports, or top Domain names over IP packets or over IP flow records. Since the complete dataset is often not available or not feasible to examine, we are interested in processing top-k queries from samples. If all records can be processed, the top-k items can be obtained by counting the frequency of each item. Even when the full dataset is observed, however, resources are often insufficient for such counting and techniques were developed to overcome this issue. When we can observe only a random sample of the records, an orthogonal complication arises: The top frequencies in the sample are biased estimates of the actual top-k frequencies. This bias as depends on the distribution and must be accounted for when seeking the actual value. We address this by designing and evaluating several schemes that derive rigorous confidence bounds for top-k estimates. Simulations on various data sets that include IP flows data, show that schemes that exploit more of the structure of the sample distribution produce much tight confidence intervals with an order of magnitude fewer samples than simpler schemes that utilize only the sampled top-k frequencies. The simpler schemes, however, are more efficient in terms of computation. Our work is basic and is widely applicable to all applications that process top-k and heavy hitters queries over a random sample of the actual records.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
Moses Charikar , Surajit Chaudhuri , Rajeev Motwani , Vivek Narasayya, Towards estimation error guarantees for distinct values, Proceedings of the nineteenth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, p.268-279, May 15-18, 2000, Dallas, Texas, United States
[doi> 10.1145/335168.335230]
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
E. Cohen, H. Kaplan, Y. Mansour, and M. Sharir. Tail estimates for dependent increasing sums. Manuscript, 2006.
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
Nick Duffield , Carsten Lund , Mikkel Thorup, Estimating flow distributions from sampled flow statistics, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 25-29, 2003, Karlsruhe, Germany
[doi> 10.1145/863955.863992]
|
| |
9
|
B. Efron and R. Tibshrani. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993.
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
Tatsuya Mori , Masato Uchida , Ryoichi Kawahara , Jianping Pan , Shigeki Goto, Identifying elephant flows through periodically sampled packets, Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, October 25-27, 2004, Taormina, Sicily, Italy
[doi> 10.1145/1028788.1028803]
|
| |
21
|
|
|