|
ABSTRACT
The FreeBSD, GNU/Linux, Solaris, and Windows operating systems have kernels that provide comparable facilities. Interestingly, their code bases share almost no common parts, while their development processes vary dramatically. We analyze the source code of the four systems by collecting metrics in the areas of file organization, code structure, code style, the use of the C preprocessor, and data organization. The aggregate results indicate that across various areas and many different metrics, four systems developed using wildly different processes score comparably. This allows us to posit that the structure and internal quality attributes of a working, non-trivial software artifact will represent first and foremost the engineering requirements of its construction, with the influence of process being marginal, if any.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
L. W. Cannon et al. Recommended C style and coding standards. Available online (February 2008) http://sunland.gsfc.nasa.gov/info/cstyle.html.
|
| |
2
|
S. N. Cant, D. R. Jeffery, and B. L. Henderson-Sellers. A conceptual model of cognitive complexity of elements of the programming process. Information and Software Technology, 37(7):351--362, June 1995.
|
| |
3
|
A. Capiluppi and G. Robles, editors. FLOSS ?07: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Emerging Trends in FLOSS Research and Development. IEEE Computer Society, May 2007.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
M. A. Cusumano and R. W. Selby. Microsoft Secrets. The Free Press, New York, 1995.
|
| |
6
|
M. A. Cusumano and R. W. Selby. Microsoft Secrets. The Free Press, New York, 1995.
|
| |
7
|
J. Feller, editor. 5-WOSSE: Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Open Source Software Engineering. ACM Press, 2005.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
B. Fitzgerald and J. Feller. A further investigation of open source software: Community, co-ordination, code quality and security issues. Information Systems Journal, 12(1):3--5, 2002.
|
| |
11
|
The FreeBSD Project. Style?Kernel Source File Style Guide, Dec. 1995. FreeBSD Kernel Developer?s Manual: style(9). Available online http://www.freebsd.org/docs.html (January 2006).
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
 |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
P. C. Rigby and D. M. German. A preliminary examination of code review processes in open source projects. Technical Report DCS-305-IR, University of Victoria, January 2006.
|
| |
29
|
|
 |
30
|
|
| |
31
|
H. A. Small, editor. Form and Function: Remarks on Art by Horatio Greenough. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1947.
|
| |
32
|
S. K. Sowe, I. G. Stamelos, and I. Samoladas, editors. Emerging Free and Open Source Software Practices. IGI Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2007.
|
| |
33
|
|
| |
34
|
|
| |
35
|
|
| |
36
|
|
| |
37
|
R. Stallman et al. GNU coding standards. Available online http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/ (January 2006), Dec. 2005.
|
| |
38
|
I. Stamelos, L. Angelis, A. Oikonomou, and G. L. Bleris. Code quality analysis in open source software development. Information Systems Journal, 12(1):43--60, 2002.
|
| |
39
|
|
| |
40
|
|
| |
41
|
|
| |
42
|
Liguo Yu , Stephen R. Schach , Kai Chen , Gillian Z. Heller , Jeff Offutt, Maintainability of the kernels of open-source operating systems: a comparison of linux with FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD, Journal of Systems and Software, v.79 n.6, p.807-815, June 2006
[doi> 10.1016/j.jss.2005.08.014]
|
| |
43
|
|
CITED BY 2
|
|
Diomidis Spinellis , Georgios Gousios , Vassilios Karakoidas , Panagiotis Louridas , Paul J. Adams , Ioannis Samoladas , Ioannis Stamelos, Evaluating the Quality of Open Source Software, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS), 233, p.5-28, March, 2009
|
|
|
|
|