ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The effect of the number of inspectors on the defect estimates produced by capture-recapture models
Full text PdfPdf (300 KB)
Source
International Conference on Software Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering table of contents
Leipzig, Germany
SESSION: Empirical testing & analysis table of contents
Pages 331-340  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-079-1
Authors
Gursimran Singh Walia  Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA
Jeffrey C. Carver  Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA
Nachiappan Nagappan  Microsoft Research, Redmond, VA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 135,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1368088.1368134
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Inspections can be made more cost-effective by using capture-recapture methods to estimate post-inspection defects. Previous capture-recapture studies of inspections used relatively small data sets compared with those used in biology and wildlife research (the origin of the models). A common belief is that capture-recapture models underestimate the number of defects but their performance can be improved with data from more inspectors. This increase has not been evaluated in detail. This paper evaluates new estimators from biology not been previously applied to inspections. Using a data from seventy-three inspectors, we analyze the effect of the number of inspectors on the quality of estimates. Contrary to previous findings indicating that Jackknife is the best estimator, our results show that the SC estimators are better suited to software inspections. Our results also provide a detailed analysis of the number of inspectors necessary to obtain estimates within 5% to 20% of the actual.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Burnham, K.P. and Overtom, W.S., "Estimation of the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Probabilities Vary Among Animals." Biometrica, 1978. 65: 625--633.
 
5
Chao, A., "Estimation the population Size for Capture-Recapture Data with Unequal Catchability." Biometrics, 1987. 43(4): 783--791.
 
6
Chao, A., "Estimating Animal Abundance with Capture Frequency Data." Journal of Wildlife Management, 1988. 52(2): 295--300.
 
7
Chao, A. and Yeng, H.C., Program CARE-2 (for Capture-Recapture Part.2), http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw, 2003.
 
8
Darroch, J.N., "The Multiple-Recapture Conensus 1: Estimation of a Closed Population." Biometrika, 1958. 45: 343--359.
 
9
10
 
11
Eick, S., Loader, C., Weil, S.V., and Votta, L. "How Many Errors Remain in a Software Design after Inspection". In Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on the Interface. 1993:
 
12
 
13
 
14
Lee, S.M. and Chao, A., "Estimating Population Size via Sample Coverage for Closed Capture-Recapture Models." Biometrics, 1994. 50: 88--97.
 
15
Miller, J., "Estimating the Number of Remaining Defects after Inspection." Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 1999. 9(3): 167--189.
 
16
Otis, D., Burnham, K., White, G., and Anderson, D., "Statistical Inference from Capture Data on Closed Animal Population." Wildlife Monograph, 1978. 64: 1--135.
 
17
Petersson, H., Thelin, T., Runeson, P., and Wohlin, C., "Capture-Recapture in Software Inspections after 10 Years Research - Theory, Evaluation and Application." Journal of Systems and Software, 2003.
 
18
19
 
20
Thelin, T. and Runeson, P. "Capture-Recapture Estimators for perspective Based Reading - A Simulating Experiment". In Proceedings of the International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement. 1999:
 
21
Thelin, T., Petersson, P., and Runeson, P., "Confidence Intervals for Capture-Recapture Estimations in Software Inspections." Journal of Information and Software Technology, 2002. 44(12): 683--702.
 
22
 
23
White, G.C., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.p., and Otis, D.l., Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations, Los Alomos National Laboratory, 1982.
 
24
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., and Brantestam, J., "An Experimental Evaluation of Capture-Recapture in Software Inspections." Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, 1995. 5(4): 213--232.
 
25
 
26
Yip, P.S.F., "A Martingale Estimating Equation for a Capture-Recapture Experiment in Discrete Time." Biometrics, 1991. 47: 1081--1088.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gursimran Singh Walia: colleagues
Jeffrey C. Carver: colleagues
Nachiappan Nagappan: colleagues