One world, one web ... but great diversity

ABSTRACT

The mantra "One World, One Web" has a strong appeal to Web developers. They think of it as a design philosophy based on use of internationally agreed open standards for providing universal access to networked resources and services available on the World Wide Web. But does the available evidence show that practices match this philosophy? How would such an approach work in a Web 2.0 environment in which users may be authors of content?

This paper reviews the limitations of the dependence on a single WAI model and WCAG 1.0 guidelines. It describes a holistic approach to Web accessibility that has been discussed previously. There are additional complexities of accessibility in a Web 2.0 environment, in which not only can readers be creators of Web resources in a variety of formats, but also content can be surfaced in a variety of ways, addressed in this paper. The authors describe how the holistic model, initially developed to support the development of accessible e-learning in a Web 2.0 context, is well-suited for a Web 2.0 environment.

The paper provides a case study to illustrate how this holistic approach can be applied in the development of Web resources for users with learning difficulties. The paper concludes by arguing that future work to enhance the accessibility of Web services should focus on the development and commissioning processes rather than continue the current narrow emphasis on the compliance with universal accessibility guidelines of the digital resources themselves, independently of the context of their use.

Finally, the paper refers to two new developments that support the wider focus, providing for individual user-centred accessibility with descriptions of resources and components enabling adaptation of resources to individual needs and preferences.

REFERENCES

• 1: AFB (2008) Thanks Facebook, AFB Blog, 29 January 2008. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.afb.org/blog/blog_comments.asp?TopicID=3371
• 2: BBC (2007) PC stripper helps spam to spread, BBC News, 30 October 2007. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7067962.stm
• 3: BSI (2006) Guide to good practice in commissioning accessible websites, BSI PAS 78. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.bsi-global.com/en/Shop/Publication-Detail/?pid=000000000030129227
• 4: Cabinet Office (2005) eAccessibility is an issue for all of us, Cabinet Office, 24 November 2005. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/newsroom/news_releases/2005/051124_eaccessibility.aspx
• 5: Wendy A. Chisholm , Shawn Lawton Henry, Interdependent components of web accessibility, Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), May 10-10, 2005, Chiba, Japan [doi>10.1145/1061811.1061818]
• 6: Clark J. (2006) To Hell with WCAG 2. A List Apart No. 217 Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://alistapart.com/articles/tohellwithwcag2
• 7: Common Knowledge (2008) Common Knowledge. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.ckfriends.org.uk/
• 8: Cummings J. (2007) Sarah Robbins on Teaching in Second Life, Educause Connect, 20 March 2007. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://connect.educause.edu/blog/jcummings/sarahrobbinsonteachingins/20447
• 9: DCMI (2008) AccessForAll Framework, Dublincore.org. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://dublincore.org/accessibilitywiki/AccessForAllFramework
• 10: Disaboom (2008) Disaboom. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.disaboom.com/
• 11: Draffan, E. A.; Rainger, P. (2006) "A model for the identification of challenges to blended learning" in ALT-J, Volume 14, Number 1, Number 1/March 2006, pp. 55--67 (13Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group
• 12: FLUID (2008) What Is FLUID? Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://fluidproject.org/
• 13: Headstar (2008) Work Begins On British Standard For Accessible Websites, E-Government Bulletin, 18 February 2008. Retrieved February 18^th 2008: http://www.headstar.com/egblive/?p=84
• 14: IMS (2008) Access For All Meta-data, Best Practice and Implementation Guide, IMS. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/accmdv1p0/imsaccmd_bestv1p0.html
• 15: Brian Kelly , David Sloan , Lawrie Phipps , Helen Petrie , Fraser Hamilton, Forcing standardization or accommodating diversity?: a framework for applying the WCAG in the real world, Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), May 10-10, 2005, Chiba, Japan [doi>10.1145/1061811.1061820]
• 16: Brian Kelly , David Sloan , Stephen Brown , Jane Seale , Helen Petrie , Patrick Lauke , Simon Ball, Accessibility 2.0: people, policies and processes, Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), May 07-08, 2007, Banff, Canada [doi>10.1145/1243441.1243471]
• 17: Liddy Nevile, Adaptability and accessibility: a new framework, Proceedings of the 17th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Citizens Online: Considerations for Today and the Future, November 21-25, 2005, Canberra, Australia
• 18: Nevile, L., and Ford, M. (2006). "Location and Access: Issues Enabling Accessibility of Information" in Multimedia Cartography (2nd Edition) Eds. Cartwright, W. Peterson M. & Gartner G.. ISBN 3-540-36650-4 Springer-Verlag-Heidelberg.
• 19: Nevile, L. and Treviranus, J. (2006). Interoperability for Individual Learner Centred Accessibility for Web-based Educational Systems in IEEE TCLT's Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Volume 9, Issue 4, 2006 Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.ifets.info/issues.php?id=33
• 20: Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Critical texts in social work and the welfare state. London: Macmillan Education.
• 21: Phipps, L., Witt, N. and McDermott, A. (2005) Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.techdis.ac.uk/index.php?p=3_8_8
• 22: Pickard J. (2006) Whistle stop WCAG 2.0: To Hell ... and back. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.thepickards.co.uk/index.php/200608/whistle-stop-wcag-2-to-hell-and-back/
• 23: RNIB (2007) CAPTCHA - if your name's not down you're not coming in, Web Access Centre Blog, 30 October 2007. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.rnib.org.uk/wacblog/images/captcha-if-youre-names-not-down-youre-not-coming-in/
• 24: Scratch (2008) Scratch Home: imagine, programme, share. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://scratch.mit.edu/
• 25: UN (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities {A/RES/61/106} Retrieved December 9, 2007, from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=199
• 26: W3C (1999) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/
• 27: W3C (2000) Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. February 2000. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-AUTOOLS/
• 28: W3C (2002) User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. December 2002. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/
• 29: W3C (2006) Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG). 23 March 2006. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/
• 30: W3C (2007a) Education & Outreach Working Group (EOWG). 30 March 2007. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/
• 31: W3C (2007b) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, W3C Working Draft 11 December 2007. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
• 32: W3C (2007c) Is WCAG 2.0 almost done?!, W3C Q&A Blog, 12 December 2007. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.w3.org/QA/2007/12/is_wcag_20_almost_done.html
• 33: YouTube (2007) Wheeling in Second Life, YouTube. Retrieved February 17^th 2008: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBlaiBV_yJs.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY
      K.4.2 Social Issues

General Terms:
Documentation, Human Factors, Measurement, Standardization, Verification

Keywords:
AccessforAll, WAI, WCAG, guidelines, metadata, methodologies, people with disabilities, web accessibility