A web design framework for improved accessibility for people with disabilities (WDFAD)

ABSTRACT

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) such as the World Wide Web (WWW) has increasingly become embedded in everyday life and is progressively becoming indispensable for public, business, personal efficiency or even improvement of livelihoods [1]. Web users including People with Disabilities (PWDs) can conveniently undertake a number of tasks that would otherwise be difficult or impossible. But many Web applications such as e-learning, e-commerce and e-government are not accessible to PWDs including the blind. Through Web accessibility guidelines, Web developers can develop Web applications that are accessible to PWDs. However, majority of the available accessibility guidelines are difficult to integrate into existing developer workflows and rarely offer specific suggestions that are developer oriented. In this paper, we propose a Web Design Framework for Improved Accessibility for People with Disabilities (WDFAD). The WDFAD provides precise guidelines on how to develop Web applications that are accessible to PWDs particularly the blind. These are packaged according to the three components of Web applications namely; content, navigation and user interface. Using constructs of the Non Functional Requirements (NFR) Framework, Web accessibility design objectives are represented as primary goals and sub goals. The primary goals represent the high level accessibility design objectives, while the sub goals represent the requirements that need to be met in the Web development process in order to meet each primary goal. WDFAD also illustrates the overlaps between the process of meeting each primary goal. This unveils the optimal ways of achieving Web accessibility during Web design. The precise nature of WDFAD and its packaging according to the main components of Web applications makes Web accessibility requirements potentially easier to understand and apply by Web developers. Web Developers prefer precise and familiar tools due to their busy work life and daily interface and expression in formal instructions. In addition, the global versus local classification of Web accessibility requirements in WDFAD modularizes the web accessibility guidelines hence making them easier to understand, apply and update.

REFERENCES

• 1: Natukunda C., (2008). Have PWDs been left out of digital age? The New Vision News paper, Monday, February 4, 2008. New Vision Printing and Publishing Corporation, Uganda.
• 2: Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle A., & Greenidge K. D. (2005) Improving Web accessibility: A study of Webmaster perceptions, Computers in Human Behaviour, 20, 2005, 269288.
• 3: Chaomeng James Huang, Usability of E-Government Web-Sites for People with Disabilities, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03) - Track 5, p.147.3, January 06-09, 2003
• 4: Nielsen J., Beyond Accessibility: Treating Users with Disabilities as People. Jakob Nielsens Alertbox November 11, 2001, accessed on 5th November 2006 from: http//www.useit.com/alertbox/20011111.html.
• 5: Hironobu Takagi , Chieko Asakawa , Kentarou Fukuda , Junji Maeda, Accessibility designer: visualizing usability for the blind, Proceedings of the 6th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, October 18-20, 2004, Atlanta, GA, USA
• 6: Disability Rights Commission, (2004). Disability Rights Commission. The web access and inclusion for disabled people. Technical report, Disability Rights Commission (DRC), UK, 2004.
• 7: Abanumy A.,., Al-Badi A., and Mayhew P.(2005). E-government website Accessibility: In-Depth Evaluation of Saudi Arabia and Oman. The Electronic Journal of e-Government Volume 3 Issue 3
• 8: Chieko Asakawa, What's the web like if you can't see it?, Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), May 10-10, 2005, Chiba, Japan [doi>10.1145/1061811.1061813]
• 9: Jeffrey P. Bigham , Richard E. Ladner, Accessmonkey: a collaborative scripting framework for web users and developers, Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), May 07-08, 2007, Banff, Canada [doi>10.1145/1243441.1243452]
• 10: PCMagazine.com retrieved from http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0,2542,t=Web+ application&i=54272,00.asp on 16th February 2008.
• 11: Jim Thatcher , Cynthia Waddell, Constructing Accessible Websites, APress L. P., 2003
• 12: Chisholm and Vanderheiden ed., (1999). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0: W3C Recommendation 5-May-1999 retrieved on 13th February, 2007 from http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/
• 13: Shwabe and Rossi, (1999). Developing Hypermedia Applications using OOHDM retrieved from on 11th January 2008.
• 14: Sarah Horton, Designing beneath the surface of the web, Proceedings of the 2006 international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility (W4A): Building the mobile web: rediscovering accessibility?, May 22-22, 2006, Edinburgh, U.K. [doi>10.1145/1133219.1133221]
• 15: Aaron Leventhal, Structure benefits all, Proceedings of the 2006 international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility (W4A): Building the mobile web: rediscovering accessibility?, May 22-22, 2006, Edinburgh, U.K. [doi>10.1145/1133219.1133226]
• 16: Chiang M. F., et al., (2005). Computer and World Wide Web Accessibility by Visually Disabled Patients: Problems
• 17: Caldwell, B. et al., (2007). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 W3C Working Draft 11 December 2007, retrieved on 18^th March 2008 from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ on 18^th March 2008
• 18: Byrne J., (2002). Table Manners: Creating accessible Tables for both layout and data, The Making Connections Unit, January 2002.Retrieved on 10th February from http://www.mcu.org.uk/articles/tables.html
• 19: Brewer, J.(ed.).(2005) How People with Disabilities Use the Web, 2005, retrieved on 20th April 2007 http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/Overview.html-use
• 20: Bouraoui, M. A., Jemni, M. M. and Laabidi, M. J. (2007). A model driven framework to provide Accessible E-Learning for Students with Disabilities, In Proc. Of ICTA '07, April 12--14, Hammamet, Tunisia
• 21: J. Mylopoulos , L. Chung , B. Nixon, Representing and Using Nonfunctional Requirements: A Process-Oriented Approach, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.18 n.6, p.483-497, June 1992 [doi>10.1109/32.142871]
• 22: Chung, L., Nixon, B. and Yu, E. (1995)In proc. of the second IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 27--29 March 1995, York, England.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.3 PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES
      D.3.3 Language Constructs and Features

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Standardization, Theory

Keywords:
blind, people with disabilities, requirements, web accessibility, web design framework