ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
E-learning 2.0: you are We-LCoME!
Full text DaisyDaisy (1.70 MB),  PdfPdf (488 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 317 archive
Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A) table of contents
Beijing, China
SESSION: Web 2.0 and accessibility table of contents
Pages 116-125  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-153-8
Authors
Stefano Ferretti  University of Bologna, Bologna (BO), Italy
Silvia Mirri  University of Bologna, Bologna (BO), Italy
Ludovico Antonio Muratori  University of Bologna, Cesena (FC), Italy
Marco Roccetti  University of Bologna, Bologna (BO), Italy
Paola Salomoni  University of Bologna, Bologna (BO), Italy
Sponsors
: Zakon Group
: Google
SIGACCESS: ACM Special Interest Group on Accessible Computing
Microsoft : Microsoft
: The Mozilla Foundation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 68,   Downloads (12 Months): 492,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1368044.1368070
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Internet is turning into a participating community where consumers and producers of resources merge into "prosumers", dialectically sharing their knowledge, their interests and needs. This Web 2.0 archetype is now strongly impacting on e-learning methodologies and technologies, by enforcing the participation of students in creating and sharing materials and resources. Overcoming latent alarms introduced by the coming out of new complex tools, e-learning 2.0 represents a new challenge for accessibility. The production of accessible contents can now be turned from an impossible mission centrally managed by teachers and institutions to a joint work of people improving learning materials.

In this context, we present an e-learning 2.0 tool, designed and developed to support users in editing educational resources and compounding multimedia contents through a collaborative work. Starting from a multimedia resource provided by the lecturer, an entire community can contribute in adding alternative contents and views, creating a multidimensional information structure. The resulting enriched resource can be tailored to a specific user by resorting to automatic adaptation mechanisms. This system can be used to transform the content production workflow, involving all the different actors (lecturers, learning technologists, student support services, staff developers and students) playing a role in improving accessibility and, more generally, effectiveness of learning materials.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
BitTorrent. Available from: http://www.bittorrent.com/, 2008.
3
 
4
DokuWiki. Available from: http://wiki.splitbrain.org, 2008.
 
5
Downes, S. E-learning 2.0. Available from: http://www.downes.ca/post/31741, 2005.
 
6
Facebook. Available from: http://www.facebook.com/, 2008.
 
7
 
8
 
9
GoogleVideo. Available from: http://video.google.com/, 2008.
 
10
IMS Global Learning Consortium. IMS AccessForAll MetaData. Available from: http://www.imsglobal.org/specificationdownload.cfm, 2004.
 
11
IMS Global Learning Consortium. IMS Learner Information Package Accessibility for LIP. Available from: http://www.imsglobal.org/specificationdownload.cfm, 2002.
 
12
Limsee2. Available from: http://limsee2.gforge.inria.fr/, 2008.
 
13
Kawamoto, P. N., Fuwa, Y., Kunimune, H., Iwama, E., and Tanaka, J. Work in progress: Sharing Learning Resources in the Development of an Online Engineering Presentations Course. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference (San Diego, California, USA, October 28--21, 2006), 2006, 9--10.
14
 
15
MySpace. Available from: http://www.myspace.com/, 2008.
 
16
 
17
O'Reilly, T. Web 2.0 Compact Definition: Trying Again. Available from: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/12/web_20_compact.h tml, 2006.
 
18
Rotovnik, T., Stergar, J. and Horvat, B. Implementing External Applications in an Multimedia Authoring Environment. In Proceedings of EUROCON 2003 (Ljubljana, Slovak Republic, September 22--24), 2003, 135--139.
19
 
20
Salomoni, P., Mirri, S., Muratori, L. A., Ferretti, S., and Roccetti, M. Why LAUGHing is better than SMILing. International Journal of Semantic Computing (IJSC), (December 2007), World Scientific Publishing, accepted for publication.
 
21
Stergar, J. and Horvat, B. Distance learning approach in multimedia tutoring. In Proceedings of the EUROCON 2001 (Bratislava, Slovak Republic, July 4--7, 2001), 2001, 259--262.
 
22
Sung, M. Y. and Lee, D. H. A collaborative authoring system for multimedia presentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (Paris, France, June 20--24, 2004), IEEE Computer Society, 2004, 1396--1400.
 
23
World Wide Web Consortium. Accessibility Features of SMIL. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/SMILaccess/, 1999.
 
24
World Wide Web Consortium. Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, W3C Recommendation 3 February 2000. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-AUTOOLS/, 2000.
 
25
World Wide Web Consortium. Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PP): Structure and Vocabularies 1.0. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-CCPP-struct-vocab-20040115, 2004.
 
26
World Wide Web Consortium. Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language 2.1. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20051213/, 2005.
 
27
YouTube. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/, 2008.
 
28
3TMAN. Available from: http://www.multimediadocument.com/, 2008.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Stefano Ferretti: colleagues
Silvia Mirri: colleagues
Ludovico Antonio Muratori: colleagues
Marco Roccetti: colleagues
Paola Salomoni: colleagues