|
ABSTRACT
The Internet is turning into a participating community where consumers and producers of resources merge into "prosumers", dialectically sharing their knowledge, their interests and needs. This Web 2.0 archetype is now strongly impacting on e-learning methodologies and technologies, by enforcing the participation of students in creating and sharing materials and resources. Overcoming latent alarms introduced by the coming out of new complex tools, e-learning 2.0 represents a new challenge for accessibility. The production of accessible contents can now be turned from an impossible mission centrally managed by teachers and institutions to a joint work of people improving learning materials. In this context, we present an e-learning 2.0 tool, designed and developed to support users in editing educational resources and compounding multimedia contents through a collaborative work. Starting from a multimedia resource provided by the lecturer, an entire community can contribute in adding alternative contents and views, creating a multidimensional information structure. The resulting enriched resource can be tailored to a specific user by resorting to automatic adaptation mechanisms. This system can be used to transform the content production workflow, involving all the different actors (lecturers, learning technologists, student support services, staff developers and students) playing a role in improving accessibility and, more generally, effectiveness of learning materials.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
BitTorrent. Available from: http://www.bittorrent.com/, 2008.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
DokuWiki. Available from: http://wiki.splitbrain.org, 2008.
|
| |
5
|
Downes, S. E-learning 2.0. Available from: http://www.downes.ca/post/31741, 2005.
|
| |
6
|
Facebook. Available from: http://www.facebook.com/, 2008.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
GoogleVideo. Available from: http://video.google.com/, 2008.
|
| |
10
|
IMS Global Learning Consortium. IMS AccessForAll MetaData. Available from: http://www.imsglobal.org/specificationdownload.cfm, 2004.
|
| |
11
|
IMS Global Learning Consortium. IMS Learner Information Package Accessibility for LIP. Available from: http://www.imsglobal.org/specificationdownload.cfm, 2002.
|
| |
12
|
Limsee2. Available from: http://limsee2.gforge.inria.fr/, 2008.
|
| |
13
|
Kawamoto, P. N., Fuwa, Y., Kunimune, H., Iwama, E., and Tanaka, J. Work in progress: Sharing Learning Resources in the Development of an Online Engineering Presentations Course. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference (San Diego, California, USA, October 28--21, 2006), 2006, 9--10.
|
 |
14
|
Brian Kelly , David Sloan , Stephen Brown , Jane Seale , Helen Petrie , Patrick Lauke , Simon Ball, Accessibility 2.0: people, policies and processes, Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), May 07-08, 2007, Banff, Canada
[doi> 10.1145/1243441.1243471]
|
| |
15
|
MySpace. Available from: http://www.myspace.com/, 2008.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
O'Reilly, T. Web 2.0 Compact Definition: Trying Again. Available from: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/12/web_20_compact.h tml, 2006.
|
| |
18
|
Rotovnik, T., Stergar, J. and Horvat, B. Implementing External Applications in an Multimedia Authoring Environment. In Proceedings of EUROCON 2003 (Ljubljana, Slovak Republic, September 22--24), 2003, 135--139.
|
 |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
Salomoni, P., Mirri, S., Muratori, L. A., Ferretti, S., and Roccetti, M. Why LAUGHing is better than SMILing. International Journal of Semantic Computing (IJSC), (December 2007), World Scientific Publishing, accepted for publication.
|
| |
21
|
Stergar, J. and Horvat, B. Distance learning approach in multimedia tutoring. In Proceedings of the EUROCON 2001 (Bratislava, Slovak Republic, July 4--7, 2001), 2001, 259--262.
|
| |
22
|
Sung, M. Y. and Lee, D. H. A collaborative authoring system for multimedia presentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (Paris, France, June 20--24, 2004), IEEE Computer Society, 2004, 1396--1400.
|
| |
23
|
World Wide Web Consortium. Accessibility Features of SMIL. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/SMILaccess/, 1999.
|
| |
24
|
World Wide Web Consortium. Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, W3C Recommendation 3 February 2000. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-AUTOOLS/, 2000.
|
| |
25
|
World Wide Web Consortium. Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PP): Structure and Vocabularies 1.0. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-CCPP-struct-vocab-20040115, 2004.
|
| |
26
|
World Wide Web Consortium. Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language 2.1. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20051213/, 2005.
|
| |
27
|
YouTube. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/, 2008.
|
| |
28
|
3TMAN. Available from: http://www.multimediadocument.com/, 2008.
|
CITED BY 2
|
|
Hironobu Takagi , Shinya Kawanaka , Masatomo Kobayashi , Takashi Itoh , Chieko Asakawa, Social accessibility: achieving accessibility through collaborative metadata authoring, Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, October 13-15, 2008, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
|
|
|
|
|