ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A syntactic analysis of accessibility to a corpus of statistical graphs
Full text DaisyDaisy (0 KB),  PdfPdf (368 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 317 archive
Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A) table of contents
Beijing, China
SESSION: User agents and an accessible rich internet application table of contents
Pages 37-44  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-153-8
Authors
Leo Ferres  Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Petro Verkhogliad  Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Livia Sumegi  Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Louis Boucher  Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Canada
Martin Lachance  Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Canada
Gitte Lindgaard  Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Sponsors
: Zakon Group
: Google
SIGACCESS: ACM Special Interest Group on Accessible Computing
Microsoft : Microsoft
: The Mozilla Foundation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1368044.1368053
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Designing graphs and charts visually by means of graphing applications such as OpenOffice or MS Excel is extremely efficient and cost-effective. However, one of the drawbacks of such approach is that graphs are sometimes involuntarily made less accessible by, for instance, using a text box as title. In this paper we evaluate a corpus of 120 ecologically-valid statistical graphs for accessibility problems, discuss possible algorithms to solve these problems and finally propose the OM (Object Model) Principle, which states that any digital object is made more accessible by simply using the application's model for that object: for instance, the TITLE field for the title text.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
 
4
L. Ferres, M. Dumontier, and N. Villanueva-Rosales. Semantic query answering with time-series graphs. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Vocabularies, Ontologies and Rules for The Enterprise (VORTE 2007), 2007.
 
5
L. Ferres, A. Parush, Z. Li, Y. Oppacher, and G. Lindgaard. Representing and querying line graphs in natural language: The iGraph system. In SmartGraphics 2006, number 4073 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 248--253, Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. Springer-Verlag.
 
6
L. Ferres, A. Parush, S. Roberts, and G. Lindgaard. Helping People with Visual Impairments Gain Access to Graphical Information Through Natural Language: The iGraph System. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 2006.
7
8
9
 
10
 
11
N. Green, G. Carenini, S. Kerpedjiev, S. F. Roth, and J. Moore. A media-independent content language for integrated text and graphics generation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Content Visualization and Intermedia Representations (CVIR'98) of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING '98) and the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'98), August 1998.
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
S. Kosslyn. Understanding charts and graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3:185--225, 1989.
 
16
J. Larkin and H. Simon. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1):65--100, 1987.
 
17
S. Lewandowsky and I. Spence. The perception of statistical graphs. Sociological Methods and Research, 18:200--242, 1989.
 
18
19
 
20
S. Pinker. A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle, editor, Artificial intelligence and the future of testing, pages 73--126. L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1990.
 
21
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
World Wide Web Consortium. Extensible Markup Language (XML). http://www.w3.org/XML/, 2007.
 
26
World Wide Web Consortium. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition), DTD Definition. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/\#dt-doctype, 2007.
 
27
World Wide Web Consortium. Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT-TECHS, 2000.
 
28
World Wide Web Consortium. Web accessibility initiative. http://www.w3.org/WAI/, 2006.
 
29
World Wide Web Consortium. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT, 1999.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Leo Ferres: colleagues
Petro Verkhogliad: colleagues
Livia Sumegi: colleagues
Louis Boucher: colleagues
Martin Lachance: colleagues
Gitte Lindgaard: colleagues