ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Design research in digital government: a query prosthesis for voters
Full text PdfPdf (515 KB)
Source
dg.o; Vol. 289 archive
Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Digital government research table of contents
Montreal, Canada
SESSION: Research papers and management, case study & policy papers: voting table of contents
Pages 73-81  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-099-9
Author
Scott P. Robertson  University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
Sponsors
: Routledge
: Elsevier
: Springer
: Cefrio
NCDG : National Center for Digital Government
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

The internet is an increasingly important source of information about political candidates and issues. Voters and candidates alike are taking advantage of a wide variety of internet tools. Many internet users continue to be unskilled at the use of search tools and find a restricted subset of available information. A simple assistive technology was developed to help voters formulate queries. This "query prosthesis" changed the search and browsing patterns of participants in a mock voting study and provides guidelines for more comprehensive interfaces to help voters. An argument is made for greater application of design science in digital government research.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Belkin, N. J. (1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval, The Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, pp. 133--143.
 
3
Carroll, J. (1997). Human-computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, pp. 61--83.
4
 
5
Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., & Turnbull, D. (2000a). Information seeking and the web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday, 5 (2). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_2/choo/index.html
 
6
 
7
Dervin, B. & Nilan, B. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, pp. 3--33.
8
 
9
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), pp. 75--105.
 
10
 
11
 
12
Hsieh-Yee, I. (1993). Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(3), pp. 161--174.
 
13
Huang, L. & Price, V. (2001). Motivations, goals, information search, and memory about political candidates, Political Psychology, 22(4), pp. 665--692.
 
14
Huddy, L. & Gunnthorsdottir, A. H. (2000). The persuasive effects of emotive visual imagery: Superficial manipulation or the product of passionate reason? Political Psychology, 21(4), pp. 745--778.
 
15
 
16
Kohut, A. & Rainie, L. (2003). Modest increase in Internet use for campaign 2002. Pew Internet and American Life Project report. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PRC_PIP_Election_2002.pdf
 
17
Lau, R. R. & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
 
18
Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), pp.309--326.
 
19
 
20
 
21
Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.
 
22
Owen, C. (1997). Design research: Building the knowledge base. Journal of the Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 5(2), pp. 36--45.
 
23
Rainie, L. & Horrigan, J. (2007). Election 2006 online. Pew Internet and American Life Project report. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Politics_2006.pdf
 
24
Rainie, L. Horrigan, J., & Cornfield, M. (2005). The internet and campaign 2004. Pew Internet and American Life Project report. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_2004_Campaign.pdf
 
25
Redlawsk. D. P. (2001). You must remember this: A test of the online model of voting. Journal of Politics, 63(1), pp. 29--58.
 
26
Redlawsk, D. P. (2004). What voters do: Information search during election campaigns. Political Psychology, 25(4), 2004, pp. 595--610.
27
28
29
 
30
 
31
32
 
33
 
34
 
35
 
36
 
37
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research, Journal of Documentation, 55(3), pp. 249--270.